Literature DB >> 21296639

Clinical evaluation of a dental color analysis system: the Crystaleye Spectrophotometer®.

Chikayuki Odaira1, Sozo Itoh, Kanji Ishibashi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical performance of the Crystaleye Spectrophotometer(®), a dental color analysis system.
METHODS: Three color-measuring devices (Crystaleye Spectrophotometer(®), CAS-ID1, MSC-2000) were tested and the differences in color measurements among them were evaluated using Scheffe's F-test. Color measurements with the Crystaleye Spectrophotometer(®) were repeated 10 times by the same operator. The color difference (ΔE) between the first and tenth measurements was calculated. The Crystaleye Spectrophotometer(®) was used to measure the color of the maxillary left central incisor under two conditions (light and dark) and the effect of exterior lighting was analyzed to assess the accuracy of measurements. Furthermore, five different operators performed color measurements, and ΔE among the three devices was calculated. The ΔE between the target tooth and the crown of a single maxillary central incisor crown fabricated using data from the Crystaleye Spectrophotmeter(®) was calculated. Color differences between prebleaching and postbleaching were also analyzed with the Crystaleye Spectrophotometer(®) using the parameters ΔE, ΔL*, Δa*, and Δb*.
RESULTS: The data from the three spectrophotometers were not significantly different. The ΔE during repeated color measurements by the same operator was 0.6. The ΔE between light and dark conditions was 0.9. The data from the five operators were not significantly different. The mean ΔE value between the target tooth and the fabricated crown was 1.2 ± 0.4, and the mean ΔE value between prebleaching and postbleaching was 3.7 ± 1.0.
CONCLUSIONS: The Crystaleye Spectrophotometer(®) is an easy-to-use color analysis system producing accurate color measurements under clinical conditions.
Copyright © 2011 Japan Prosthodontic Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21296639     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2010.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont Res        ISSN: 1883-1958            Impact factor:   4.642


  7 in total

1.  The Effect of two Shading Techniques on Value of Zirconia-Based Crowns.

Authors:  Ahmad Hassan Ahangari; Kianoosh Torabi Ardakani; Farideh Mahdavi; Mahshid Torabi Ardakani
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2015-06

2.  Examination of the Position Accuracy of Implant Abutments Reproduced by Intra-Oral Optical Impression.

Authors:  Hitoshi Ajioka; Hidemichi Kihara; Chikayuki Odaira; Takuya Kobayashi; Hisatomo Kondo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Xiao-Chuan Fan; Li Chen; Xiao-Feng Huang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Influence of Dental Education on Esthetics Self-Perception and Shade Selection.

Authors:  Passent Ellakany; Shaimaa M Fouda; Maram A AlGhamdi; Nourhan M Aly
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  The effect of powder A2/powder A3 mixing ratio on color and translucency parameters of dental porcelain.

Authors:  Wan-Sun Lee; So-Yeon Kim; Ji-Hwan Kim; Woong-Chul Kim; Hae-Young Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Repeatability of the human eye compared to an intraoral scanner in dental shade matching.

Authors:  Juan Reyes; Pamela Acosta; Dalina Ventura
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-07-23

7.  The development of a 3D colour reproduction system of digital impressions with an intraoral scanner and a 3D printer: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Yushu Liu; Rui Zhang; Hongqiang Ye; Shimin Wang; Kuan-Paul Wang; Yunsong Liu; Yongsheng Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.