Literature DB >> 21296399

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy or early cystectomy? Single-center analysis of outcomes after therapy for patients with clinically localized micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Islam A Ghoneim1, Ranko Miocinovic, Andrew J Stephenson, Jorge A Garcia, Michael C Gong, Steven C Campbell, Donna E Hansel, Amr F Fergany.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the treatment outcomes of patients with micropapillary bladder cancer (MPBC). MPBC is a rare variant of urothelial carcinoma with aggressive clinical behavior. Radical cystectomy is considered the standard approach for treatment of patients with localized disease; however, the role of perioperative systemic therapy has been poorly defined.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review identified 38 consecutive patients who had been treated at our institution for MPBC from 2000 to 2010. The patient data were analyzed for the pre- and postoperative clinicopathologic features, treatment course, and cancer-specific survival.
RESULTS: The median follow-up of surviving patients after cystectomy was 17 months (range 2-75). At the initial transurethral biopsy, 28 patients (74%) had clinical Stage T2N0 or less. In this group, 26 (93%) of 28 were upstaged to nonorgan-confined and/or lymph node-positive disease. Overall, 32 patients (86%) had evidence of lymph node metastasis on the final pathologic examination. All patients with cTis-T1 who had undergone initial bladder-sparing therapy with bacille Calmette-Guérin had pathologically advanced disease at cystectomy. All 15 patients who had received perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy died of metastatic disease. The 5-year overall survival rate was 40% (95% confidence interval 16-64).
CONCLUSIONS: MPBC is an aggressive disease with a high likelihood of regional lymph node metastasis at the initial presentation. Although radical cystectomy plays a critical role in treatment, systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy might be a more appropriate strategy than immediate cystectomy. Because of the poor response to current chemotherapy agents, the development of new and effective drugs for this subset of patients could be needed.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21296399     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.11.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  21 in total

1.  Micropapillary morphology is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with transurethral resection and radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Simone Bertz; S Wach; H Taubert; R Merten; F S Krause; S Schick; O J Ott; E Weigert; O Dworak; C Rödel; R Fietkau; B Wullich; B Keck; A Hartmann
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Clinical outcomes of cT1 micropapillary bladder cancer.

Authors:  Daniel L Willis; Mario I Fernandez; Rian J Dickstein; Sahil Parikh; Jay B Shah; Louis L Pisters; Charles C Guo; Samuel Henderson; Bogdan A Czerniak; H Barton Grossman; Colin P Dinney; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: definition, treatment and future efforts.

Authors:  Sandip M Prasad; G Joel Decastro; Gary D Steinberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Dose dense MVAC prior to radical cystectomy: a real-world experience.

Authors:  Homayoun Zargar; Jay B Shah; Elisabeth E Fransen van de Putte; Kylea R Potvin; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Bas W van Rhijn; Siamak Daneshmand; Jeff M Holzbeierlein; Philippe E Spiess; Eric Winquist; Simon Horenblas; Colin Dinney; Peter C Black; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Contemporary update on neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Daniel P Nguyen; George N Thalmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Comparison of tyrosine kinase receptors HER2, EGFR, and VEGFR expression in micropapillary urothelial carcinoma with invasive urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jianhong Li; Cynthia L Jackson; Dongfang Yang; Lelia Noble; Michael Wheeler; Dolores MacKenzie; Temitope Adegun; Ali Amin
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.493

7.  A single-institute experience of trimodal bladder-preserving therapy for histologic variants of urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Nagumo; Takahiro Kojima; Masanobu Shiga; Shuya Kandori; Tomokazu Kimura; Ei-Ichiro Takaoka; Mizuki Onozawa; Jun Miyazaki; Koji Kawai; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Hideyuki Sakurai; Hiroyuki Nishiyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Micropapillary bladder cancer: a clinico-pathological characterization and treatment analysis.

Authors:  Z Li; H Liao; Z Tan; D Mao; Y Wu; Y M Xiao; S K Yang; L Zhong
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 9.  Micropapillary bladder cancer: current treatment patterns and review of the literature.

Authors:  Daniel L Willis; Thomas W Flaig; Donna E Hansel; Matthew I Milowsky; Robert L Grubb; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Elizabeth R Plimack; Theresa M Koppie; David J McConkey; Colin P Dinney; Vanessa A Hoffman; Michael J Droller; Edward Messing; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 10.  Characteristics and clinical significance of histological variants of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Marco Moschini; David D'Andrea; Stephan Korn; Yasin Irmak; Francesco Soria; Eva Compérat; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.