Literature DB >> 21296391

Prospective comparative study of endoscopic management of bladder lithiasis: is prostate surgery a necessary adjunct?

Prodromos Philippou1, Demetrios Volanis, Ioannis Kariotis, Efraim Serafetinidis, Demetrios Delakas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To present the results of a prospective study comparing transurethral cystolithotripsy and simultaneous transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), with transurethral cystolithotripsy and medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The traditional dogma that bladder lithiasis constitutes an absolute indication for prostatic surgery has recently been questioned.
METHODS: A total of 64 patients with bladder calculi were included in the present study. In all patients, stone clearance was achieved transurethrally. The patients in group 1 (n=32) underwent TURP during the same session, and the patients in group 2 (n=32) underwent medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (tamsulosin plus finasteride).
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 28.23±8.84 months. No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups regarding the preoperative parameters (age, International Prostate Symptom Score, prostatic volume, peak urinary flow rate, postvoid residual urine volume, prostate-specific antigen level, and bladder stone characteristics). Both groups experienced statistically significant postoperative improvements in the International Prostate Symptom Score, peak urinary flow rate, and postvoid residual urine volume. However, patients in group 1 experienced a more pronounced improvement in the International Prostate Symptom Score (P=.02) and peak urinary flow rate (P=.001). In total, 11 patients in group 2 underwent TURP during follow-up, with medical management considered to have failed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the postvoid residual urine volume as an independent risk factor that predicted the need for TURP in group 2 patients (odds ratio 1.033, 95% CI for odds ratio 1.007-1.060, P=.014).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study have provided useful information on the natural history of bladder lithiasis, particularly in the context of improved patient consultation.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21296391     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Transurethral cystolithotripsy with a novel special endoscope.

Authors:  Aihua Li; Honghai Lu; Chengdong Ji; Sikuan Liu; Feng Zhang; Xiaoqiang Qian; Hui Wang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-08-26

Review 2.  Stones in special situations.

Authors:  Mordechai Duvdevani; Stavros Sfoungaristos; Karim Bensalah; Benoit Peyronnet; Amy Krambeck; Sanjay Khadji; Ahmet Muslumanuglu; David Leavitt; Jude Divers; Zeph Okeke; Arthur Smith; Janelle Fox; Michael Ost; Andreas J Gross; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel approach during transurethral pneumatic cystolithotripsy in large urinary bladder stone: quasi-clinical trial.

Authors:  E A Shalaby
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Transurethral cystolitholapaxy with the AH-1 stone removal system for the treatment of bladder stones of variable size.

Authors:  Aihua Li; Chengdong Ji; Hui Wang; Genqiang Lang; Honghai Lu; Sikuan Liu; Weiwu Li; Binghui Zhang; Wei Fang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Multiple Uric Acid Bladder Stones: Clinical Presentation and Endoscopic Management.

Authors:  Fabio Cesar Miranda Torricelli; Shih-Chieh Jeff Chueh; Shujane Shen; Manoj Monga
Journal:  J Endourol Case Rep       Date:  2017-02-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.