Literature DB >> 21296102

Dynamical systems modeling of Continuous Flash Suppression.

Daisuke Shimaoka1, Kunihiko Kaneko.   

Abstract

Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) is a technique in which a stationary image in one eye can be reliably suppressed by rapid presentation of different flashing images in the other. In this paper we address why flashing stimuli modulate the visibility of the stimuli. We determine, in particular, which type of neural network is sufficient for the modulation of the dominance duration, assuming that elemental units are endowed with reciprocal inhibition and adaptation. We show that the model introduced by Wilson (2007) reproduces flash suppression, which is considered to be involved in CFS, but does not reproduce CFS. We then extend the model by including a stimulus feature dimension. With this extension, we found that the model accounts for the modulation of visibility observed in CFS. In addition, this model captured some defining characteristics of CFS such as dependence on flash interval and the depth of suppression. Our findings suggest that a network with inhibition and adaptation including feature dimension provides a crucial mechanism for the modulation of the dominance duration in CFS.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21296102     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Deconstructing continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Crowding by invisible flankers.

Authors:  Cristy Ho; Sing-Hang Cheung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression?

Authors:  Timo Stein; Martin N Hebart; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  Neural processing of visual information under interocular suppression: a critical review.

Authors:  Philipp Sterzer; Timo Stein; Karin Ludwig; Marcus Rothkirch; Guido Hesselmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-19

5.  Elucidating unconscious processing with instrumental hypnosis.

Authors:  Mathieu Landry; Krystèle Appourchaux; Amir Raz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-28

6.  Interocular suppression prevents interference in a flanker task.

Authors:  Qiong Wu; Jonathan T H Lo Voi; Thomas Y Lee; Melissa-Ann Mackie; Yanhong Wu; Jin Fan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-11

7.  Moving stimuli are less effectively masked using traditional continuous flash suppression (CFS) compared to a moving Mondrian mask (MMM): a test case for feature-selective suppression and retinotopic adaptation.

Authors:  Pieter Moors; Johan Wagemans; Lee de-Wit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparing unconscious processing during continuous flash suppression and meta-contrast masking just under the limen of consciousness.

Authors:  Ziv Peremen; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-11

Review 9.  Binocular fusion, suppression and diplopia for blurred edges.

Authors:  Mark A Georgeson; Stuart A Wallis
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Access to Awareness for Faces during Continuous Flash Suppression Is Not Modulated by Affective Knowledge.

Authors:  Milena Rabovsky; Timo Stein; Rasha Abdel Rahman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.