Literature DB >> 21295808

Is minimally invasive, video-assisted thyroidectomy feasible in Graves' disease?

Pier F Alesina1, Reyaz M Singaporewalla, Anja Eckstein, Harald Lahner, Martin K Walz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the safety and advantages of minimally invasive, video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) are well documented in nodular thyroid disease, its role in Graves' disease is controversial. We compared the outcomes of patients undergoing MIVAT with those undergoing conventional thyroidectomy for Graves' disease.
METHODS: Of the 497 patients with Graves' disease referred for surgery (1999-2009), 157 (31.6%) patients underwent the MIVAT procedure (video-assisted group). As a control group, 340 patients undergoing conventional thyroidectomy (conventional thyroidectomy group) were included in the current analysis. MIVAT was proposed if the thyroid volume was ≤ 30 mL. The data were obtained through a prospectively maintained surgical database.
RESULTS: Most patients in both groups underwent total thyroidectomy (98% in the MIVAT group and 96.5% in the conventional group). Three (1.9%) conversions to open surgery occurred in the video-assisted group. Hospital stay was significantly shorter (P = .008) in the video-assisted group (2.1 ± 0.4 days) compared with the conventional thyroidectomy group (2.4 ± 1.4 days). The mean operative time was shorter (84 ± 29 min; range, 15-240) for the video-assisted group compared with the conventional thyroidectomy group (94 ± 43 min; range, 20-360), although this difference was not statistically significant (P = .05). Postoperative transient hypocalcemia occurred in 14 (8.9%), transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy occurred in 2 (1.3%), and postoperative hematoma occurred in 5 (3.2%) patients in the video-assisted group compared with 23 (6.8%), 11 (3.2%), and 8 (2.3%) patients in the conventional thyroidectomy group, respectively (P = ns).
CONCLUSION: In selected patients with Graves' disease, MIVAT is feasible and can be performed safely with results comparable with open surgery.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21295808     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  4 in total

1.  Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in video-assisted thyroidectomy: lessons learned from neuromonitoring.

Authors:  G Dionigi; P F Alesina; M Barczynski; L Boni; F Y Chiang; H Y Kim; G Materazzi; G W Randolph; D J Terris; C W Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Systematic review with meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials comparing minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and conventional thyroidectomy (CT).

Authors:  Adolfo Pisanu; Mauro Podda; Isabella Reccia; Giulia Porceddu; Alessandro Uccheddu
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Short-Term Outcomes of Surgery for Graves' Disease in Germany.

Authors:  Elisabeth Maurer; Christian Vorländer; Andreas Zielke; Cornelia Dotzenrath; Moritz von Frankenberg; Hinrich Köhler; Kerstin Lorenz; Theresia Weber; Joachim Jähne; Antonia Hammer; Knut A Böttcher; Katharina Schwarz; Carsten Klinger; Heinz J Buhr; Detlef K Bartsch
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: seven-year experience with 240 cases.

Authors:  Marcin Barczyński; Aleksander Konturek; Małgorzata Stopa; Aleksandra Papier; Wojciech Nowak
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 1.195

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.