Literature DB >> 21295642

Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with EUS-guided FNA: a systematic review.

Kai-Xuan Wang1, Qi-Wen Ben, Zhen-Dong Jin, Yi-Qi Du, Duo-Wu Zou, Zhuan Liao, Zhao-Shen Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) permits both morphologic and cytologic analysis of lesions within or adjacent to the GI tract. Although previous studies have evaluated the accuracy of EUS-FNA, little is known about the complications of EUS-FNA. Moreover, the frequency and severity of complications may vary from center to center and may be related to differences in individual experience.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the morbidity and mortality associated with EUS-FNA.
DESIGN: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify relevant English-language articles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: EUS-FNA-specific morbidity and mortality rates.
RESULTS: We identified 51 articles with a total of 10,941 patients who met our inclusion and exclusion criteria; the overall rate of EUS-FNA-specific morbidity was 0.98% (107/10,941). In the small proportion of patients with complications of any kind, the rates of pancreatitis (36/8246; 0.44%) and postprocedure pain (37/10,941; 0.34%) were 33.64% (36/107) and 34.58% (37/107), respectively. The mortality rate attributable to EUS-FNA-specific morbidity was 0.02% (2/10,941). Subgroup analysis showed that the morbidity rate was 2.44% in prospective studies compared with 0.35% in retrospective studies for pancreatic mass lesions (P=.000), whereas it was 2.33% versus 5.07% for pancreatic cysts (P=.036). LIMITATIONS: Few articles reported well-designed, prospective studies and few focused on overall complications after EUS-FNA.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA-related morbidity and mortality rates are relatively low, and most associated events are mild to moderate in severity.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21295642     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  106 in total

1.  Pancreatic cystic lesions: How endoscopic ultrasound morphology and endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration help unlock the diagnostic puzzle.

Authors:  Luca Barresi; Ilaria Tarantino; Antonino Granata; Gabriele Curcio; Mario Traina
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-06-16

Review 2.  A State-of-the-Art Review on the Evolving Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Liver Diseases Diagnosis.

Authors:  Wisam Sbeit; Anas Kadah; Mahmud Mahamid; Rinaldo Pellicano; Amir Mari; Tawfik Khoury
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-23

3.  EUS-derived criteria for distinguishing benign from malignant metastatic solid hepatic masses.

Authors:  Larissa L Fujii-Lau; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Marco J Bruno; Kenneth J Chang; John M DeWitt; Paul Fockens; David Forcione; Bertrand Napoleon; Laurent Palazzo; Mark D Topazian; Maurits J Wiersema; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan E Clain; Douglas O Faigel; Ferga C Gleeson; Robert Hawes; Prasad G Iyer; Elizabeth Rajan; Tyler Stevens; Michael B Wallace; Kenneth K Wang; Michael J Levy
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Quality indicators for EUS.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Michael B Wallace; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; Michael L Kochman; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Jeffrey L Tokar
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Diagnostic accuracies of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with distinct negative pressure suction techniques in solid lesions: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Ronghua Wang; Jinlin Wang; Yawen Li; Yaqi Duan; Xiaoli Wu; Bin Cheng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Managing Incidental Pancreatic Cysts.

Authors:  Jennifer Phan; V Raman Muthusamy
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-06-09

Review 7.  How to measure quality in endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Antonio Facciorusso; Rosario Vincenzo Buccino; Nicola Muscatiello
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

8.  EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a simple novel device: a human pilot study.

Authors:  Jason Y Huang; Jason B Samarasena; Takeshi Tsujino; John Lee; Ke-Qin Hu; Christine E McLaren; Wen-Pin Chen; Kenneth J Chang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Pancreatic pseudocyst after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic mass.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Chung; Ji Kon Ryu; Hong Sang Oh; Ji Yeon Seo; Eunhyo Jin; Dong Hyeon Lee; Yong-Tae Kim; Yong Bum Yoon
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2012-11-30

Review 10.  The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas.

Authors:  Philippe Lévy; Vinciane Rebours
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.