Literature DB >> 21295242

The evidence for and against 'PhysioDirect' telephone assessment and advice services.

Nadine E Foster1, Bronwen Williams, Sean Grove, Jill Gamlin, Chris Salisbury.   

Abstract

Patients have experienced inadequate access to physiotherapy since the inception of the National Health Service (NHS). Over the last 50 years, many initiatives have been introduced to address this problem, the most recent being a new patient management pathway known as 'PhysioDirect'. Within these services, physiotherapists offer initial assessment and advice by telephone, sometimes supported by computerised algorithms, and patients are sent written self-management and exercise advice by post. For some patients, face-to-face physiotherapy care will be offered where this is considered to be more appropriate. Although several such services have been developed across the UK, there is no robust evidence about clinical and cost-effectiveness, nor the acceptability of PhysioDirect to patients, physiotherapists or primary care organisations. This debate article summarises models of PhysioDirect, the links to other healthcare developments and relevant evidence to date about this type of service. By providing a summary of the arguments for, and key concerns about, PhysioDirect, this article stresses the need for more definitive evidence from high-quality randomised controlled trials before widespread roll-out across the NHS.
Copyright © 2010 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21295242     DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiotherapy        ISSN: 0031-9406            Impact factor:   3.358


  6 in total

1.  Clinician's Commentary on Cott et al.(1).

Authors:  Alice Aiken
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Patient Prioritization Preferences among Physiotherapy Entry-Level Students: The Importance of Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Maude Laliberté; Debbie Ehrmann Feldman
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Effectiveness of PhysioDirect telephone assessment and advice services for patients with musculoskeletal problems: pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Chris Salisbury; Alan A Montgomery; Sandra Hollinghurst; Cherida Hopper; Annette Bishop; Angelo Franchini; Surinder Kaur; Joanna Coast; Jeanette Hall; Sean Grove; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-29

4.  PhysioDirect: supporting physiotherapists to deliver telephone assessment and advice services within the context of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Annette Bishop; Jill Gamlin; Jeanette Hall; Cherida Hopper; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.358

5.  Health services changes: is a run-in period necessary before evaluation in randomised clinical trials?

Authors:  Trishna Rathod; John Belcher; Alan A Montgomery; Chris Salisbury; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Does a modified STarT Back Tool predict outcome with a broader group of musculoskeletal patients than back pain? A secondary analysis of cohort data.

Authors:  J C Hill; E K Afolabi; M Lewis; K M Dunn; E Roddy; D A van der Windt; N E Foster
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.