BACKGROUND: Social isolation is associated with progression of cardiovascular disease, with the most socially isolated patients being at increased risk. Increased left ventricular mass is a predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It is not yet clear whether social isolation is a determinant of increased left ventricular mass. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of Northern Manhattan Study participants who were free of clinical cardiovascular disease and had obtained transthoracic echocardiograms (n=2021) and a baseline questionnaire on social habits. Social isolation was defined as the lack of friendship networks (knowing fewer than 3 people well enough to visit within their homes). Echocardiographic left ventricular mass was indexed to height(2.7), analyzed as a continuous variable and compared between exposure groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of social isolation was 13.5%. The average left ventricular mass was significantly higher (50.2 gm/m(2.7)) in those who were, as compared with those who were not (47.6 gm/m(2.7)), socially isolated (P<.05). Higher prevalence of social isolation was found among those less educated, uninsured, or unemployed. There were no significant race-ethnic differences in the prevalence of social isolation. In multivariate analysis, there was a trend toward an association between social isolation and increased left ventricular mass in the total cohort (P=.09). Among Hispanics, social isolation was significantly associated with greater left ventricular mass. Hispanics who were socially isolated averaged 3.9 gm/ht(2.7) higher left ventricular mass compared with those not socially isolated (P=.002). This relationship was not present among non-Hispanic blacks or whites. CONCLUSION: In this urban tri-ethnic cohort, social isolation was prevalent and associated with indices of low socioeconomic status. Hispanics who were socially isolated had a greater risk for increased left ventricular mass.
BACKGROUND: Social isolation is associated with progression of cardiovascular disease, with the most socially isolated patients being at increased risk. Increased left ventricular mass is a predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It is not yet clear whether social isolation is a determinant of increased left ventricular mass. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of Northern Manhattan Study participants who were free of clinical cardiovascular disease and had obtained transthoracic echocardiograms (n=2021) and a baseline questionnaire on social habits. Social isolation was defined as the lack of friendship networks (knowing fewer than 3 people well enough to visit within their homes). Echocardiographic left ventricular mass was indexed to height(2.7), analyzed as a continuous variable and compared between exposure groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of social isolation was 13.5%. The average left ventricular mass was significantly higher (50.2 gm/m(2.7)) in those who were, as compared with those who were not (47.6 gm/m(2.7)), socially isolated (P<.05). Higher prevalence of social isolation was found among those less educated, uninsured, or unemployed. There were no significant race-ethnic differences in the prevalence of social isolation. In multivariate analysis, there was a trend toward an association between social isolation and increased left ventricular mass in the total cohort (P=.09). Among Hispanics, social isolation was significantly associated with greater left ventricular mass. Hispanics who were socially isolated averaged 3.9 gm/ht(2.7) higher left ventricular mass compared with those not socially isolated (P=.002). This relationship was not present among non-Hispanic blacks or whites. CONCLUSION: In this urban tri-ethnic cohort, social isolation was prevalent and associated with indices of low socioeconomic status. Hispanics who were socially isolated had a greater risk for increased left ventricular mass.
Authors: I Kawachi; G A Colditz; A Ascherio; E B Rimm; E Giovannucci; M J Stampfer; W C Willett Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Hannah Gardener; Bonnie Levin; Janet DeRosa; Tatjana Rundek; Clinton B Wright; Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Oscar H Del Brutto; Daniel Tettamanti; Victor J Del Brutto; Mauricio Zambrano; Martha Montalván Journal: Environ Health Prev Med Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 3.674
Authors: Lenny López; Katrina Swett; Fátima Rodriguez; Jorge R Kizer; Frank Penedo; Linda Gallo; Matthew Allison; William Arguelles; Franklyn Gonzalez; Robert C Kaplan; Carlos J Rodriguez Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 2.692