Literature DB >> 21294013

The effect of work pace on workload, motor variability and fatigue during simulated light assembly work.

T Bosch1, S E Mathiassen, B Visser, M P de Looze, J H van Dieën.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of work pace on workload, motor variability and fatigue during light assembly work. Upper extremity kinematics and electromyography (EMG) were obtained on a cycle-to-cycle basis for eight participants during two conditions, corresponding to "normal" and "high" work pace according to a predetermined time system for engineering. Indicators of fatigue, pain sensitivity and performance were recorded before, during and after the task. The level and variability of muscle activity did not differ according to work pace, and manifestations of muscle fatigue or changed pain sensitivity were not observed. In the high work pace, however, participants moved more efficiently, they showed more variability in wrist speed and acceleration, but they also made more errors. These results suggest that an increased work pace, within the range addressed here, will not have any substantial adverse effects on acute motor performance and fatigue in light, cyclic assembly work. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: In the manufacturing industry, work pace is a key issue in production system design and hence of interest to ergonomists as well as engineers. In this laboratory study, increasing the work pace did not show adverse effects in terms of biomechanical exposures and muscle fatigue, but it did lead to more errors. For the industrial engineer, this observation suggests that an increase in work pace might diminish production quality, even without any noticeable fatigue being experienced by the operators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21294013     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2010.538723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Effects of local and widespread muscle fatigue on movement timing.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Cowley; Jonathan B Dingwell; Deanna H Gates
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  How Time Pressure Matter University Faculties' Job Stress and Well-Being? The Perspective of the Job Demand Theory.

Authors:  Zhong Chen; Tzaichiao Lee; Xianghua Yue; Jie Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  The effects of energy expenditure rate on work productivity performance at different levels of production standard time.

Authors:  Nurhayati Mohd Nur; Siti Zawiah Md Dawal; Mahidzal Dahari; Junedah Sanusi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-08-21

4.  Muscle activity, time to fatigue, and maximum task duration at different levels of production standard time.

Authors:  Nurhayati Mohd Nur; Siti Zawiah Md Dawal; Mahidzal Dahari; Junedah Sanusi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-07-22

5.  Strength Training Improves Fatigue Resistance and Self-Rated Health in Workers with Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Emil Sundstrup; Markus Due Jakobsen; Mikkel Brandt; Kenneth Jay; Per Aagaard; Lars Louis Andersen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Effects of Vertical Lifting Distance on Upper-Body Muscle Fatigue.

Authors:  Nianli Fang; Chang Zhang; Jian Lv
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Muscle activity and mood state during simulated plant factory work in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Satoshi Okahara; Masataka Kataoka; Kuniharu Okuda; Masato Shima; Keiko Miyagaki; Hitoshi Ohara
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-03-31

8.  Comparison of Upper Limb Muscle Activity among Workers in Large-Herd U.S. and Small-Herd Italian Dairies.

Authors:  Federica Masci; Anthony Mixco; Colleen Annika Brents; Lelia Murgia; Claudio Colosio; John Rosecrance
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2016-06-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.