Literature DB >> 21293972

Conditioning and sampling issues of EMG signals in motion recognition of multifunctional myoelectric prostheses.

Guanglin Li1, Yaonan Li, Long Yu, Yanjuan Geng.   

Abstract

Historically, the investigations of electromyography (EMG) pattern recognition-based classification of intentional movements for control of multifunctional prostheses have adopted the filter cut-off frequency and sampling rate that are commonly used in EMG research fields. In practical implementation of a multifunctional prosthesis control, it is desired to have a higher high-pass cut-off frequency to reduce more motion artifacts and to use a lower sampling rate to save the data processing time and memory of the prosthesis controller. However, it remains unclear whether a high high-pass cut-off frequency and a low-sampling rate still preserve sufficient neural control information for accurate classification of movements. In this study, we investigated the effects of high-pass cut-off frequency and sampling rate on accuracy in identifying 11 classes of arm and hand movements in both able-bodied subjects and arm amputees. Compared to a 5-Hz high-pass cut-off frequency, excluding the EMG components below 60 Hz decreased the average accuracy of 0.1% in classifying the 11 movements across able-bodied subjects and increased the average accuracy of 0.1 and 0.4% among the transradial (TR) and shoulder disarticulation (SD) amputees, respectively. Using a 500 Hz instead of a 1-kHz sampling rate, the average classification accuracy only dropped about 2.0% in arm amputees. The combination of sampling rate and high-pass cut-off frequency of 500 and 60 Hz only resulted in about 2.3% decrease in average accuracy for TR amputees and 0.4% decrease for SD amputees in comparison to the generally used values of 1 kHz and 5 Hz. These results suggest that the combination of sampling rate of 500 Hz and high-pass cut-off frequency of 60 Hz should be an optimal selection in EMG recordings for recognition of different arm movements without sacrificing too much of classification accuracy which can also remove most of motion artifacts and power-line interferences for improving the performance of myoelectric prosthesis control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21293972     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0265-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  7 in total

1.  Improving the Robustness of Real-Time Myoelectric Pattern Recognition against Arm Position Changes in Transradial Amputees.

Authors:  Yanjuan Geng; Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel; Yue Wei; Guanglin Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Feature Extraction and Selection for Myoelectric Control Based on Wearable EMG Sensors.

Authors:  Angkoon Phinyomark; Rami N Khushaba; Erik Scheme
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Upper Arm Motion High-Density sEMG Recognition Optimization Based on Spatial and Time-Frequency Domain Features.

Authors:  Dianchun Bai; Shutian Chen; Junyou Yang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Identification of Upper-Limb Movements Based on Muscle Shape Change Signals for Human-Robot Interaction.

Authors:  Pingao Huang; Hui Wang; Yuan Wang; Zhiyuan Liu; Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel; Mei Yu; Xiangxin Li; Shixiong Chen; Guanglin Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 5.  EMG Characterization and Processing in Production Engineering.

Authors:  Manuel Del Olmo; Rosario Domingo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Toward attenuating the impact of arm positions on electromyography pattern-recognition based motion classification in transradial amputees.

Authors:  Yanjuan Geng; Ping Zhou; Guanglin Li
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Comparison of six electromyography acquisition setups on hand movement classification tasks.

Authors:  Stefano Pizzolato; Luca Tagliapietra; Matteo Cognolato; Monica Reggiani; Henning Müller; Manfredo Atzori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.