Literature DB >> 21293883

Reconceptualising relocation for specialist treatment: insights from New Zealand.

Pam McGrath1, Hamish Holewa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To date, the research on relocation has been conducted in countries such as Australia where there are vast distances that need to be travelled by regional, rural and remote patients to access specialist metropolitan treatment. This research considers the issue of relocation for specialist treatment in a New Zealand context.
METHODS: The exploration of the experience of relocation from the consumers' perspective was conducted through an iterative, qualitative research methodology using open-ended interviews conducted by speaker-phone at the time and location of each participant's choice.
RESULTS: The three factors that underpin the phenomenon of 'travel-based' accommodation in New Zealand are the strong desire to return home, the small geographical distances that make this possible for many and the strong determination to endure hardship associated with travel when distances are long.
CONCLUSIONS: Any understanding of relocation for specialist treatment needs to be informed by two concepts: 'travel-based' relocation and 'accommodation-based' relocation. RELEVANCE OF MANUSCRIPT TO INFORM RESEARCH, POLICIES AND/OR PROGRAMS: The focus needs to be on providing supportive travel arrangements where possible. In New Zealand, as elsewhere, cancer supportive care organisations are increasingly providing volunteers to assist with travel. Such practical volunteer assistance is important, as is financial support through government subsidies to cover the cost of such travel. The insights from the study affirm the importance of health professionals who are supportive and creative in their efforts to assist people to return home. Supportive clinical care such as addressing issues in relation to nausea and pain management for those travelling must also be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21293883     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1102-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  9 in total

1.  Returning home after specialist treatment for hematological malignancies: an Australian study.

Authors:  P McGrath
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2001-07

Review 2.  A history of bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  M Teresa de la Morena; Richard A Gatti
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Bone marrow transplantation at the RHH.

Authors:  Louise Nicholson; Gillian Sheldon-Collins; Kylie Sih
Journal:  Aust Nurs J       Date:  2009-06

4.  Relocation for treatment for leukaemia: a description of need.

Authors:  P McGrath
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Exploring the everyday world of the patient in isolation.

Authors:  D Gaskill; A Henderson; M Fraser
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  The role of biomedical and psychosocial factors for the prediction of pain and distress in patients undergoing high-dose therapy and BMT/PBSCT.

Authors:  F Schulz-Kindermann; U Hennings; G Ramm; A R Zander; M Hasenbring
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Do allogeneic bone marrow transplant candidates match coping to controllability of pre-treatment stressors?

Authors:  Kenneth Mah; Mireille Khoraych; Jeffrey H Lipton; Hans A Messner; Ghada Khoraych; Katherine Krawiec; France Lefebvre; Gerald M Devins
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Social support, optimism, and self-efficacy predict physical and emotional well-being after bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  Nicole Hochhausen; Elizabeth M Altmaier; Richard McQuellon; Stella M Davies; Esperanza Papadopolous; Shelly Carter; Jean Henslee-Downey
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2007

9.  Accommodation for patients and carers during relocation for treatment for leukaemia: a descriptive profile.

Authors:  P McGrath
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.603

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  On the road and away from home: a systematic review of the travel experiences of cancer patients and their families.

Authors:  Cecilia Vindrola-Padros; Eugenia Brage; Pinkie Chambers
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Social disparities and symptom burden in populations with advanced cancer: specialist palliative care providers' perspectives.

Authors:  Anna Santos Salas; Sharon M Watanabe; Yoko Tarumi; Tracy Wildeman; Ana M Hermosa García; Bisi Adewale; Wendy Duggleby
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving CHOP chemotherapy treatment without adversely affecting their quality of life: cost-benefit and quality of life analysis.

Authors:  Sophie Lee; Angela Knox; Irene S L Zeng; Christin Coomarasamy; Hilary Blacklock; Samar Issa
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Non-pharmacological cancer pain interventions in populations with social disparities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna Santos Salas; Jorge Fuentes Contreras; Susan Armijo-Olivo; Humam Saltaji; Sharon Watanabe; Thane Chambers; Lori Walter; Greta G Cummings
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.