PURPOSE: The psychiatric reform in Italy devolved to the regions the responsibility of implementing community psychiatric care. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the mental health system in Lombardy by assessing changes in accessibility and patterns of care occurred between 1999 and 2009. METHODS: Data on mental health services were collected through the regional mental health information system and analyzed in terms of treated prevalence, treated incidence, continuity of care and packages of care. RESULTS: Both treated incidence and treated prevalence in Lombardy increased between 1999 and 2009. There was an increasing access to psychiatric services of people with a better social integration. Incidence of schizophrenic and personality disorders decreased and that of affective and neurotic disorders increased dramatically, while increase in prevalence concerned all diagnostic groups. The percentage of patients in continuous care remained stable and was generally low. The majority of cases, even those with schizophrenia, are cared for on outpatient basis. The percentage of patients receiving integrated multiprofessional care declined. Rates of admission to inpatient services remained low and within the inpatient sector a shift from hospital towards residential care emerged, with decreasing hospital utilization and an increase in size of patient population entering community residences. Treatment gap is still a problem in schizophrenic disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The Lombardy mental health system is strongly based on community care. However, it is reaching a turning point and it needs to be improved in some key areas: the shifting balance towards the care of common mental disorders, in the absence of resource allocations targeted to severely mentally ill, may hinder the system ability to deal with more disabled people. A focus on early intervention and an improvement of continuity of care for people with severe mental disorder, by strengthening community teams, is a priority.
PURPOSE: The psychiatric reform in Italy devolved to the regions the responsibility of implementing community psychiatric care. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the mental health system in Lombardy by assessing changes in accessibility and patterns of care occurred between 1999 and 2009. METHODS: Data on mental health services were collected through the regional mental health information system and analyzed in terms of treated prevalence, treated incidence, continuity of care and packages of care. RESULTS: Both treated incidence and treated prevalence in Lombardy increased between 1999 and 2009. There was an increasing access to psychiatric services of people with a better social integration. Incidence of schizophrenic and personality disorders decreased and that of affective and neurotic disorders increased dramatically, while increase in prevalence concerned all diagnostic groups. The percentage of patients in continuous care remained stable and was generally low. The majority of cases, even those with schizophrenia, are cared for on outpatient basis. The percentage of patients receiving integrated multiprofessional care declined. Rates of admission to inpatient services remained low and within the inpatient sector a shift from hospital towards residential care emerged, with decreasing hospital utilization and an increase in size of patient population entering community residences. Treatment gap is still a problem in schizophrenic disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The Lombardy mental health system is strongly based on community care. However, it is reaching a turning point and it needs to be improved in some key areas: the shifting balance towards the care of common mental disorders, in the absence of resource allocations targeted to severely mentally ill, may hinder the system ability to deal with more disabled people. A focus on early intervention and an improvement of continuity of care for people with severe mental disorder, by strengthening community teams, is a priority.
Authors: T Burns; J Catty; S White; S Clement; G Ellis; I R Jones; P Lissouba; S McLaren; D Rose; T Wykes Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2008-06-23 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Philip S Wang; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Jordi Alonso; Matthias C Angermeyer; Guilherme Borges; Evelyn J Bromet; Ronny Bruffaerts; Giovanni de Girolamo; Ron de Graaf; Oye Gureje; Josep Maria Haro; Elie G Karam; Ronald C Kessler; Viviane Kovess; Michael C Lane; Sing Lee; Daphna Levinson; Yutaka Ono; Maria Petukhova; José Posada-Villa; Soraya Seedat; J Elisabeth Wells Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-09-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J B Kirkbride; T Croudace; J Brewin; K Donoghue; P Mason; C Glazebrook; I Medley; G Harrison; J E Cooper; G A Doody; P B Jones Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2008-08-25 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Anne Dezetter; X Briffault; R Bruffaerts; R De Graaf; J Alonso; H H König; J M Haro; G de Girolamo; G Vilagut; V Kovess-Masféty Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Angelo Cocchi; Giorgio Cerati; Antonio Lora; Anna Meneghelli; Emiliano Monzani; Mauro Percudani; Lorenzo Petrovich; Fiorino Mirabella; Angelo Picardi; Antonio Preti Journal: Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health Date: 2014-02-07
Authors: Evangelia Loukidou; Anastasios Mastroyannakis; Tracey Power; Graham Thornicroft; Tom Craig; Nick Bouras Journal: Int J Ment Health Syst Date: 2013-03-28