Literature DB >> 21292869

Quantitative assessment of tumor blood flow in mice after treatment with different doses of an antiangiogenic agent with contrast-enhanced destruction-replenishment US.

Jian-hua Zhou1, Long-hui Cao, Ji-bin Liu, Wei Zheng, Min Liu, Rong-zhen Luo, Feng Han, An-hua Li.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify tumor blood flow by using contrast material-enhanced destruction-replenishment ultrasonography (US) to evaluate tumor response to different doses of an agent for antiangiogenic treatment in hepatoma-bearing mice, with histologic measurements of microvascular density (MVD) as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiments were approved by the regional animal care committee. Mice bearing subcutaneous H22 hepatoma were treated with different doses of thalidomide, 100 mg/kg in group B and 200 mg/kg in group C. Group A (control group) was treated with 0.5% carboxylmethylcellulose. Treatment groups and the control group included 10 mice each. Contrast-enhanced US was used to evaluate the percentage of nonenhanced area, and contrast-enhanced destruction-replenishment US was used to evaluate tumor blood flow. Tumor blood flow was compared with measurements of MVD. Comparisons were made by using one-way analysis of variance and the post hoc least significant difference test for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS: Contrast-enhanced gray-scale US showed significant increases in the percentage of nonenhanced area in group C (mean, 10.56% ± 7.25 [standard deviation]), as compared with groups A (mean, 2.40% ± 3.12; P = .004) and B (mean, 3.75% ± 5.55; P = .012). Contrast-enhanced destruction-replenishment US showed significant decreases of tumor blood flow in groups B and C, as compared with group A (P = .003 and P < .001, respectively), and the blood flow in group C was significantly lower than that of group B (P = .01). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed significant decreases of MVD in groups B and C, as compared with MVD in group A (P = .002 and P < .001, respectively); however, there was no significant difference in MVD between groups B and C (P = .21).
CONCLUSION: Quantification of tumor blood flow by using contrast-enhanced destruction-replenishment US shows the potential to guide drug dosage during antiangiogenic therapy. RSNA, 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21292869     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10101339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of tumor angiogenesis using real-time motion-compensated contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Marybeth A Pysz; Ismayil Guracar; Kira Foygel; Lu Tian; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 9.596

2.  Predictive value of quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound in hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after ablation.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Dong-Yan Zheng; Zheng Cui; Yan Ma; Yuan-Zhi Liu; Wei Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Molecular ultrasound imaging using a targeted contrast agent for assessing early tumor response to antiangiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Reshu Saini; Marshall Mahoney; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  VEGFR2-Targeted Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Can Predict Responses to Antiangiogenic Therapy in Preclinical Models of Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Jianhua Zhou; Huaijun Wang; Huiping Zhang; Amelie M Lutz; Lu Tian; Dimitre Hristov; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  A comparative evaluation of ultrasound molecular imaging, perfusion imaging, and volume measurements in evaluating response to therapy in patient-derived xenografts.

Authors:  J E Streeter; S G Herrera-Loeza; N F Neel; J J Yeh; P A Dayton
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-01-25

6.  Dose-response relationship in cisplatin-treated breast cancer xenografts monitored with dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Yao Chen; Feng Han; Long-Hui Cao; Cheng Li; Jian-Wei Wang; Qing Li; Wei Zheng; Zhi-Xing Guo; An-Hua Li; Jian-Hua Zhou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Reducing tumor growth and angiogenesis using a triple therapy measured with Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

Authors:  Philipp Marius Paprottka; Svenja Roßpunt; Michael Ingrisch; Clemens C Cyran; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Brigitte Mack; Olivier Gires; Dirk A Clevert; Pamela Zengel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Results of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Correlate With Treatment Outcome in Canine Neoplasia Treated With Electrochemotherapy and Interleukin-12 Plasmid Electrotransfer.

Authors:  Maja Brloznik; Simona Kranjc Brezar; Nina Boc; Tanja Knific; Maja Cemazar; Nina Milevoj; Gregor Sersa; Natasa Tozon; Darja Pavlin
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-20

9.  Tumor perfusion evaluation using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound after electrochemotherapy and IL-12 plasmid electrotransfer in murine melanoma.

Authors:  Maja Brloznik; Nina Boc; Maja Cemazar; Gregor Sersa; Masa Bosnjak; Simona Kranjc Brezar; Darja Pavlin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Assessment of early tumor response to cytotoxic chemotherapy with dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in human breast cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Jian-Wei Wang; Wei Zheng; Ji-Bin Liu; Yao Chen; Long-Hui Cao; Rong-Zhen Luo; An-Hua Li; Jian-Hua Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.