Literature DB >> 21292386

The impact of prostate size, median lobe, and prior benign prostatic hyperplasia intervention on robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.

Andy C Huang1, Keith J Kowalczyk, Nathanael D Hevelone, Stuart R Lipsitz, Hua-yin Yu, Blakely A Plaster, Channa A Amarasekera, William D Ulmer, Yin Lei, Stephen B Williams, Jim C Hu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Large prostate size, median lobes, and prior benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery may pose technical challenges during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).
OBJECTIVE: To describe technical modifications to overcome BPH sequelae and associated outcomes. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective study of prospective data on 951 RALP procedures performed from September 2005 to November 2010 was conducted. Outcomes were analyzed by prostate weight, prior BPH surgical intervention (n=59), and median lobes >1 cm (n=42). SURGICAL PROCEDURE: RALP. MEASUREMENTS: Estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusions, operative time, positive surgical margin (PSM), and urinary and sexual function were measured. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In unadjusted analysis, men with larger prostates and median lobes experienced higher EBL (213.5 vs 176.5 ml; p<0.001 and 236.4 vs 193.3 ml; p=0.002), and larger prostates were associated with more transfusions (4 vs 1; p=0.037). Operative times were longer for men with larger prostates (164.2 vs 149.1 min; p=0.002), median lobes (185.8 vs 155.0 min; p=0.004), and prior BPH surgical interventions (170.2 vs 155.4 min; p=0.004). Men with prior BPH interventions experienced more prostate base PSM (5.1% vs 1.2%; p=0.018) but similar overall PSM. In adjusted analyses, the presence of median lobes increased both EBL (p=0.006) and operative times (p<0.001), while prior BPH interventions also prolonged operative times (p=0.014). However, prostate size did not affect EBL, PSM, or recovery of urinary or sexual function.
CONCLUSIONS: Although BPH characteristics prolonged RALP procedure times and increased EBL, prostate size did not affect PSM or urinary and sexual function.
Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21292386     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  11 in total

1.  Clinical factors affecting perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tomohiko Murakami; Satoshi Otsubo; Ryo Namitome; Masaki Shiota; Junichi Inokuchi; Ario Takeuchi; Eiji Kashiwagi; Katsunori Tatsugami; Masatoshi Eto
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-09-13

2.  Quantification of median lobe protrusion and its impact on the base surgical margin status during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Chang Wook Jeong; Sangchul Lee; Jong Jin Oh; Byung Ki Lee; Jung Keun Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Gheeyoung Choe; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Impact of prostate weight on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with a posterior approach to the seminal vesicle.

Authors:  Takahiro Yasui; Keiichi Tozawa; Satoshi Kurokawa; Atsushi Okada; Kentaro Mizuno; Yukihiro Umemoto; Noriyasu Kawai; Shoichi Sasaki; Yutaro Hayashi; Yoshiyuki Kojima; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Urinary symptoms after robotic prostatectomy in men with median lobes.

Authors:  Satyan K Shah; Trisha Fleet; Betty Skipper
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Robotic Prostatectomy Has a Superior Outcome in Larger Prostates and PSA Density Is a Strong Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  S Bishara; N Vasdev; T Lane; G Boustead; J Adshead
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2014-12-15

6.  The Institute of Urology, Peking University prostatectomy score: a simple preoperative classification of prostate cancer for predicting surgical difficulty and risk.

Authors:  Bing-Lei Ma; Lin Yao; Wei Yu; Yu Wang; Hai-Feng Song; Zhe-Nan Zhang; Si-Meng Lu; Qian Zhang; Zhi-Song He; Jie Jin; Li-Qun Zhou
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Impact of protruded median lobe on perioperative, urinary continence and oncological outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jiajun Qian; Yao Fu; Xiao Wu; Liu Xu; Mengjie Zhang; Qing Zhang; Joel Elliot Rosenberg; Linfeng Xu; Xuefeng Qiu; Hongqian Guo
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-02

8.  Open simple prostatectomy and robotic simple prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: Comparison of safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Jeong Man Cho; Kyong Tae Moon; Jun Ho Lee; Jae Duck Choi; Jung Yoon Kang; Tag Keun Yoo
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2021-01-12

9.  Influence of operative time and blood loss on surgical margins and functional outcomes for laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Stefano Salciccia; Davide Rosati; Pietro Viscuso; Vittorio Canale; Emiliano Scarrone; Marco Frisenda; Roberta Catuzzi; Martina Moriconi; Vincenzo Asero; Stefano Signore; Mauro De Dominicis; Paolo Emiliozzi; Antonio Carbone; Antonio Luigi Pastore; Andrea Fuschi; Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Alessandro Gentilucci; Susanna Cattarino; Gianna Mariotti; Gian Maria Busetto; Matteo Ferro; Ettore De Berardinis; Gian Piero Ricciuti; Valeria Panebianco; Fabio Massimo Magliocca; Francesco Del Giudice; Martina Maggi; Alessandro Sciarra
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-11-29

Review 10.  Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mariangela Bellangino; Clare Verrill; Tom Leslie; Richard W Bell; Freddie C Hamdy; Alastair D Lamb
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.