Literature DB >> 21292129

Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: initial report of EMPEROR (Multicenter Emergency Medicine Pulmonary Embolism in the Real World Registry).

Charles V Pollack1, Donald Schreiber, Samuel Z Goldhaber, David Slattery, John Fanikos, Brian J O'Neil, James R Thompson, Brian Hiestand, Beau A Briese, Robert C Pendleton, Chadwick D Miller, Jeffrey A Kline.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In a large U.S. sample, this study measured the presentation features, testing, treatment strategies, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED).
BACKGROUND: No data have quantified the demographics, clinical features, management, and outcomes of outpatients diagnosed with PE in the ED in a large, multicenter U.S. study.
METHODS: Patients of any hemodynamic status were enrolled from the ED after confirmed acute PE or with a high clinical suspicion prompting anticoagulation before imaging for PE. Exclusions were inability to provide informed consent (where required) or unavailability for follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 1,880 patients with confirmed acute PE were enrolled from 22 U.S. EDs. Diagnosis of PE was based upon positive results of computerized tomographic pulmonary angiogram in most cases (n = 1,654 [88%]). Patients represented both sexes equally, and racial and ethnic composition paralleled the overall U.S. ED population. Most (79%) patients with PE were employed, and one-third were older than age 65 years. The mortality rate directly attributed to PE was 20 in 1,880 (1%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0% to 1.6%). Mortality from hemorrhage was 0.2%, and the all-cause 30-day mortality rate was 5.4% (95% CI: 4.4% to 6.6%). Only 3 of 20 patients with major PE that ultimately proved fatal had systemic anticoagulation initiated before diagnostic confirmation, and another 3 of these 20 received a fibrinolytic agent.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with acute PE in U.S. EDs have high functional status, and their mortality rate is low. These registry data suggest that appropriate initial medical management of ED patients with severe PE with anticoagulation is poorly standardized and indicate a need for research to determine the appropriate threshold for empiric treatment when PE is suspected before diagnostic confirmation.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21292129     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  85 in total

1.  Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Elie A Akl; Anthony J Comerota; Paolo Prandoni; Henri Bounameaux; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael E Nelson; Philip S Wells; Michael K Gould; Francesco Dentali; Mark Crowther; Susan R Kahn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Rationale, Design and Methodology of the Computerized Registry of Patients with Venous Thromboembolism (RIETE).

Authors:  Behnood Bikdeli; David Jimenez; Mayra Hawkins; Salvador Ortíz; Paolo Prandoni; Benjamin Brenner; Hervé Decousus; Frederick A Masoudi; Javier Trujillo-Santos; Harlan M Krumholz; Manuel Monreal
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  Analysis of National Trends in Admissions for Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Sean B Smith; Jeffrey B Geske; Parul Kathuria; Michael Cuttica; Daniel R Schimmel; D Mark Courtney; Grant W Waterer; Richard G Wunderink
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  Medical management of tumor lysis syndrome, postprocedural pain, and venous thromboembolism following interventional radiology procedures.

Authors:  Ali Faramarzalian; Keith B Armitage; Baljendra Kapoor; Sanjeeva P Kalva
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 5.  Comparison of the Wells score with the revised Geneva score for assessing suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Hua Shen; Hong-Lin Chen; Jian-Rong Chen; Jia-Li Xing; Peng Gu; Bao-Feng Zhu
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  [Acute pulmonary embolism: still a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge?]

Authors:  R Felgendreher; D Härtel; J Brockmeier; K Bramlage; T Aschenbrenner; J Götz; P Bramlage; U Tebbe
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 0.840

7.  Short-term outcomes of pulmonary embolism: A National Perspective.

Authors:  Purav Shah; Shilpkumar Arora; Varun Kumar; Surina Sharma; Harshil Shah; Byomesh Tripathi; Purnima Sharma; Ravina Sharma; Sejal Savani; Muhammad Raheel Qureshi; Ibrahim Faruqi
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Derivation and validation of a multivariate model to predict mortality from pulmonary embolism with cancer: The POMPE-C tool.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kline; Pierre-Marie Roy; Martin P Than; Jackeline Hernandez; D Mark Courtney; Alan E Jones; Andrea Penaloza; Charles V Pollack
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.944

9.  Treatment of Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: Knowing When to be Aggressive and When to be Conservative.

Authors:  David L Ain; Michael R Jaff
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-06

10.  Different strategies for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for lower-limb immobilisation after injury: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Abdullah Pandor; Daniel Horner; Sarah Davis; Steve Goodacre; John W Stevens; Mark Clowes; Beverley J Hunt; Tim Nokes; Jonathan Keenan; Kerstin de Wit
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.014

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.