Literature DB >> 21291995

Validation study of the Short Time Exposure (STE) test to assess the eye irritation potential of chemicals.

Hitoshi Sakaguchi1, Naoko Ota, Takashi Omori, Hirofumi Kuwahara, Takashi Sozu, Yumi Takagi, Yutaka Takahashi, Kouko Tanigawa, Miki Nakanishi, Tsuneaki Nakamura, Takashi Morimoto, Shinobu Wakuri, Yuko Okamoto, Mayumi Sakaguchi, Takumi Hayashi, Takayuki Hanji, Shinichi Watanabe.   

Abstract

Short time exposure (STE) test is a cytotoxicity test in SIRC cells (rabbit corneal cell line) that assesses eye irritation potential following a 5-min chemical exposure. This validation study assessed transferability, intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility, and predictive capacity of STE test in five laboratories (supported by Japanese Society for Alternatives to Animal Experiments). Sodium lauryl sulfate, calcium thioglycolate, and Tween 80 were evaluated, in triplicate, using 5%, 0.5%, and 0.05% concentrations in physiological saline, to confirm transferability. Good transferability was noted when similar mean relative viabilities and rank classifications were obtained in all five laboratories and were comparable to data from test method developing laboratory. Good intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility was obtained with four assay controls (three solvents and one positive control), and four assay controls and 25 chemicals, respectively. STE irritation category based on relative viability of a 5% solution of 25 blinded test chemicals showed good correlation with Globally Harmonized System (GHS) categories (NI; I: Cat. 1 and 2). The STE prediction model, using relative viability of the 5% and 0.05% solutions, provided an irritation rank (1, 2, or 3) that had a good correlation (above 80%), or predictive capacity, with GHS irritation ranks in all laboratories. Based on these findings, the STE test is a promising alternative eye irritation test that could be easily standardized.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21291995     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  10 in total

1.  Excipients of preservative-free latanoprost induced inflammatory response and cytotoxicity in immortalized human HCE-2 corneal epithelial cells.

Authors:  Adrian Smedowski; Jussi J Paterno; Elisa Toropainen; Debasish Sinha; Edward Wylegala; Kai Kaarniranta
Journal:  J Biochem Pharmacol Res       Date:  2014-12-01

2.  Establishment of a new immortalized human corneal epithelial cell line (iHCE-NY1) for use in evaluating eye irritancy by in vitro test methods.

Authors:  Naoki Yamamoto; Yoshinao Kato; Atsushi Sato; Noriko Hiramatsu; Hiromi Yamashita; Mahito Ohkuma; Ei-Ichi Miyachi; Masayuki Horiguchi; Koji Hirano; Hajime Kojima
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 3.  Same-chemical comparison of nonanimal eye irritation test methods: Bovine corneal opacity and permeability, EpiOcular™, isolated chicken eye, ocular Irritection®, OptiSafe™, and short time exposure.

Authors:  Stewart Lebrun; Linda Nguyen; Sara Chavez; Roxanne Chan; Debby Le; Minh Nguyen; James V Jester
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Predictive performance of the Vitrigel-eye irritancy test method using 118 chemicals.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamaguchi; Hajime Kojima; Toshiaki Takezawa
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.446

5.  Analysis of Draize eye irritation testing and its prediction by mining publicly available 2008-2014 REACH data.

Authors:  Thomas Luechtefeld; Alexandra Maertens; Daniel P Russo; Costanza Rovida; Hao Zhu; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 6.043

Review 6.  Cosmetics Europe compilation of historical serious eye damage/eye irritation in vivo data analysed by drivers of classification to support the selection of chemicals for development and evaluation of alternative methods/strategies: the Draize eye test Reference Database (DRD).

Authors:  João Barroso; Uwe Pfannenbecker; Els Adriaens; Nathalie Alépée; Magalie Cluzel; Ann De Smedt; Jalila Hibatallah; Martina Klaric; Karsten R Mewes; Marion Millet; Marie Templier; Pauline McNamee
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Formulation of Ocular In Situ Gels with Lithuanian Royal Jelly and Their Biopharmaceutical Evaluation In Vitro.

Authors:  Kristina Perminaite; Mindaugas Marksa; Monika Stančiauskaitė; Tadas Juknius; Aidas Grigonis; Kristina Ramanauskiene
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Retrospective analysis of the Draize test for serious eye damage/eye irritation: importance of understanding the in vivo endpoints under UN GHS/EU CLP for the development and evaluation of in vitro test methods.

Authors:  Els Adriaens; João Barroso; Chantra Eskes; Sebastian Hoffmann; Pauline McNamee; Nathalie Alépée; Sandrine Bessou-Touya; Ann De Smedt; Bart De Wever; Uwe Pfannenbecker; Magalie Tailhardat; Valérie Zuang
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Determining the Depth of Injury in Bioengineered Tissue Models of Cornea and Conjunctiva for the Prediction of All Three Ocular GHS Categories.

Authors:  Michaela Zorn-Kruppa; Pia Houdek; Ewa Wladykowski; Maria Engelke; Melinda Bartok; Karsten R Mewes; Ingrid Moll; Johanna M Brandner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Characterization of new eye drops with choline salicylate and assessment of their irritancy by in vitro short time exposure tests.

Authors:  Katarzyna Wroblewska; Małgorzata Kucinska; Marek Murias; Janina Lulek
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.330

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.