Literature DB >> 21291263

Substrate specificity of protein tyrosine phosphatases 1B, RPTPα, SHP-1, and SHP-2.

Lige Ren1, Xianwen Chen, Rinrada Luechapanichkul, Nicholas G Selner, Tiffany M Meyer, Anne-Sophie Wavreille, Richard Chan, Caterina Iorio, Xiang Zhou, Benjamin G Neel, Dehua Pei.   

Abstract

We determined the substrate specificities of the protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) PTP1B, RPTPα, SHP-1, and SHP-2 by on-bead screening of combinatorial peptide libraries and solution-phase kinetic analysis of individually synthesized phosphotyrosyl (pY) peptides. These PTPs exhibit different levels of sequence specificity and catalytic efficiency. The catalytic domain of RPTPα has very weak sequence specificity and is approximately 2 orders of magnitude less active than the other three PTPs. The PTP1B catalytic domain has modest preference for acidic residues on both sides of pY, is highly active toward multiply phosphorylated peptides, but disfavors basic residues at any position, a Gly at the pY-1 position, or a Pro at the pY+1 position. By contrast, SHP-1 and SHP-2 share similar but much narrower substrate specificities, with a strong preference for acidic and aromatic hydrophobic amino acids on both sides of the pY residue. An efficient SHP-1/2 substrate generally contains two or more acidic residues on the N-terminal side and one or more acidic residues on the C-terminal side of pY but no basic residues. Subtle differences exist between SHP-1 and SHP-2 in that SHP-1 has a stronger preference for acidic residues at the pY-1 and pY+1 positions and the two SHPs prefer acidic residues at different positions N-terminal to pY. A survey of the known protein substrates of PTP1B, SHP-1, and SHP-2 shows an excellent agreement between the in vivo dephosphorylation pattern and the in vitro specificity profiles derived from library screening. These results suggest that different PTPs have distinct sequence specificity profiles and the intrinsic activity/specificity of the PTP domain is an important determinant of the enzyme's in vivo substrate specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21291263      PMCID: PMC3074353          DOI: 10.1021/bi1014453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  104 in total

1.  CD45 and RPTPalpha display different protein tyrosine phosphatase activities in T lymphocytes.

Authors:  D H Ng; M D Jabali; A Maiti; P Borodchak; K W Harder; T Brocker; B Malissen; F R Jirik; P Johnson
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Crystal structure of the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2.

Authors:  P Hof; S Pluskey; S Dhe-Paganon; M J Eck; S E Shoelson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Affinity selection from peptide libraries to determine substrate specificity of protein tyrosine phosphatases.

Authors:  G Huyer; J Kelly; J Moffat; R Zamboni; Z Jia; M J Gresser; C Ramachandran
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1998-04-10       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Structural determinants of SHP-2 function and specificity in Xenopus mesoderm induction.

Authors:  A M O'Reilly; B G Neel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Comparative kinetic analysis and substrate specificity of the tandem catalytic domains of the receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatase alpha.

Authors:  L Wu; A Buist; J den Hertog; Z Y Zhang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  A family of proteins that inhibit signalling through tyrosine kinase receptors.

Authors:  A Kharitonenkov; Z Chen; I Sures; H Wang; J Schilling; A Ullrich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Development of "substrate-trapping" mutants to identify physiological substrates of protein tyrosine phosphatases.

Authors:  A J Flint; T Tiganis; D Barford; N K Tonks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Identification of a second aryl phosphate-binding site in protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B: a paradigm for inhibitor design.

Authors:  Y A Puius; Y Zhao; M Sullivan; D S Lawrence; S C Almo; Z Y Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The B-cell transmembrane protein CD72 binds to and is an in vivo substrate of the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1.

Authors:  Y Wu; M J Nadler; L A Brennan; G D Gish; J F Timms; N Fusaki; J Jongstra-Bilen; N Tada; T Pawson; J Wither; B G Neel; N Hozumi
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-09-10       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Identification of major binding proteins and substrates for the SH2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 in macrophages.

Authors:  J F Timms; K Carlberg; H Gu; H Chen; S Kamatkar; M J Nadler; L R Rohrschneider; B G Neel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  41 in total

1.  Positive and negative signaling through SLAM receptors regulate synapse organization and thresholds of cytolysis.

Authors:  Fang Zhao; Jennifer L Cannons; Mala Dutta; Gillian M Griffiths; Pamela L Schwartzberg
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 31.745

2.  Slit and Receptor Tyrosine Phosphatase 69D Confer Spatial Specificity to Axon Branching via Dscam1.

Authors:  Dan Dascenco; Maria-Luise Erfurth; Azadeh Izadifar; Minmin Song; Sonja Sachse; Rachel Bortnick; Olivier Urwyler; Milan Petrovic; Derya Ayaz; Haihuai He; Yoshiaki Kise; Franziska Thomas; Thomas Kidd; Dietmar Schmucker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  pCAP-based peptide substrates: the new tool in the box of tyrosine phosphatase assays.

Authors:  Stephanie M Stanford; Divya Krishnamurthy; Rhushikesh A Kulkarni; Caitlin E Karver; Eveline Bruenger; Logan M Walker; Chen-Ting Ma; Thomas D Y Chung; Eduard Sergienko; Nunzio Bottini; Amy M Barrios
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  Regulation of Connexin32 by ephrin receptors and T-cell protein-tyrosine phosphatase.

Authors:  Andrew J Trease; Hanjun Li; Gaelle Spagnol; Li Zheng; Kelly L Stauch; Paul L Sorgen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Identification of PP1-Gadd34 substrates involved in the unfolded protein response using K-BIPS, a method for phosphatase substrate identification.

Authors:  Pavithra M Dedigama-Arachchige; Nuwan P N Acharige; Mary Kay H Pflum
Journal:  Mol Omics       Date:  2018-04-16

6.  Profiling Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Specificity with Self-Assembled Monolayers for Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry and Peptide Arrays.

Authors:  Che-Fan Huang; Milan Mrksich
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.784

7.  Phosphatase specificity and pathway insulation in signaling networks.

Authors:  Michael A Rowland; Brian Harrison; Eric J Deeds
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Heat Oscillations Driven by the Embryonic Cell Cycle Reveal the Energetic Costs of Signaling.

Authors:  Jonathan Rodenfels; Karla M Neugebauer; Jonathon Howard
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 9.  Shp1 function in myeloid cells.

Authors:  Clare L Abram; Clifford A Lowell
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.962

10.  Specificity profiling of dual specificity phosphatase vaccinia VH1-related (VHR) reveals two distinct substrate binding modes.

Authors:  Rinrada Luechapanichkul; Xianwen Chen; Hashem A Taha; Shubham Vyas; Xiaoyan Guan; Michael A Freitas; Christopher M Hadad; Dehua Pei
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.