Literature DB >> 21289786

Monitoring adverse drug reactions: a preliminary study.

J L Reynolds.   

Abstract

The feasibility of family physicians functioning as monitors of adverse drug reactions (ADR) was examined over one month in ten practices. This was done as a preliminary trial, before attempting to use the 200 family physicians of the National Reporting System of the College of Family Physicians of Canada to monitor ADRs on a national basis. Both of these trials were designed to examine the feasibility of family physicians acting as prospective monitors of ADRs in newly marketed drugs and to identify a drug group suitable for monitoring. This study examined the detection of ADRs, prescribing and practice profiles. No firm conclusion could be reached as to the value of family doctors monitoring ADRs. This study supports the evidence that older patients receive more drugs and are at even greater risk of an ADR. Antibiotics, cardiovascular, anti-inflammatory or antidepressant drugs are suggested as those most suitable for prospective monitoring in a family practice setting.

Entities:  

Year:  1981        PMID: 21289786      PMCID: PMC2306112     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  7 in total

1.  The physician's responsibility in the age of therapeutic plenty.

Authors:  M C SHEPS; A P SHAPIRO
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1962-02       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Adverse drug reactions. A critical review.

Authors:  F E Karch; L Lasagna
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1975-12-22       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The role of hospital personnel in reporting adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  J A Visconti; M C Smith
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1967-05

4.  Treated adverse effects of drugs in an ambulatory population.

Authors:  W H Campbell; R E Johnson; R A Senft; D J Azevedo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Postmarketing surveillance of new drugs: I. Review of objectives and methodology.

Authors:  W M Wardell; M C Tsianco; S N Anavekar; H T Davis
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1979 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 3.126

6.  The case for recording events in clinical trials.

Authors:  D C Skegg; R Doll
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-12-10

7.  Predisposing factors in adverse reactions to drugs.

Authors:  N Hurwitz
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1969-03-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.