Literature DB >> 21289586

Anatomical feasibility of pediatric cervical pedicle screw insertion by computed tomographic morphometric evaluation of 376 pediatric cervical pedicles.

P Rishimugesh Kanna1, Ajoy Prasad Shetty, S Rajasekaran.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective analysis of computed tomographic images of 376 normal pediatric cervical pedicles.
OBJECTIVE: To study the normal cervical pedicle morphometrics, the changes in pedicle morphology with skeletal growth, and the possibility of pedicle screw insertion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although the usage of cervical pedicle screws in adults has become established, the feasibility of its application in children has not been studied. There are no in vivo studies that define the normal pediatric cervical pedicle morphometrics and its changes with growth and development of the child.
METHODS: A total of 376 normal pediatric cervical spine pedicles of 30 children (mean age = 6.7 ± 3.9 years) were analyzed for pedicle width (PW), pedicle height (PH), pedicle length (PL), pedicle axis length (PAL), transverse pedicle angle (TPA), and sagittal pedicle angle (SPA). The study population was categorized into three age groups (A: <5 years, B: 5-10 years, and C >10 years). The mean values of these parameters in the different age groups and the possibility of application cervical pedicle screws were studied. RESULTS.: The mean PW was lowest in the C3 vertebra and increased distally to be widest at C7. Sixty percent of C3 pedicles had a width less than 4 mm making screw passage risky and unsafe. With growth, the PW increased at all levels but this increase was significant only up to the age of 10 years. More than 75% of adult pedicle dimensions were achieved by 5 years of age. The mean PL at all levels remained the same with no significant increase with growth. However, the PAL showed continuous increase with growth similar to PW. The PAL also showed an increase from C3 to C7. The PH was always more than the PW at any level. Mild insignificant asymmetry was present between the right and left side pedicles in all values.
CONCLUSION: With growth, there was a gradual increase in PW, PH, and PAL but was mainly before the age of 10 years. Majority of C3 pedicles were thin making screw fixation unsafe. However, at all other levels, the pedicle morphometrics per se were adequate and do not restrict safe application of 3-mm cervical pedicle screw.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21289586     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fb3c17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Cervical pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography imaging with a mobile scanner gantry.

Authors:  Toshitaka Yoshii; Takashi Hirai; Kenichiro Sakai; Hiroyuki Inose; Tsuyoshi Kato; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Anatomic feasibility of posterior cervical pedicle screw placement in children: computerized tomographic analysis of children under 10 years old.

Authors:  HoJin Lee; Jae Taek Hong; Il Sup Kim; Moon Suk Kim; Jae Hoon Sung; Sang Won Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-12-31

Review 3.  Aneurysmal bone cyst of C2 treated with novel anterior reconstruction and stabilization.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran; Siddharth N Aiyer; Ajoy Prasad Shetty; Rishi Kanna; Anupama Maheswaran
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Quantification of pediatric cervical growth: anatomical changes in the sub-axial spine.

Authors:  Ho Jin Lee; Jung Jae Lee; Jae Taek Hong; Jong Tae Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-03-20

5.  Novel Landmark for Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion Point from Computed Tomography-Based Study.

Authors:  Kazuya Nishizawa; Kanji Mori; Akira Nakamura; Shinji Imai
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-02-17

6.  Nutrient foramen location on the laminae provides a landmark for pedicle screw entry: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Masahito Oshina; Yasushi Oshima; Yoshitaka Matsubayashi; Yuki Taniguchi; Hirotaka Chikuda; Kiehyun Daniel Riew; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Morphological analysis for subaxial cervical pedicle screw insertion in developmental and non-developmental canal stenosis.

Authors:  Song Wang; Gangyi Yang; Ce Zhu; Jianping Kang; Qing Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  TOMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF C7, T1 AND T2 VERTEBRAE ANATOMY IN CHILDREN.

Authors:  Gabriela Estefanía Delgado Cabrera; Marcelo Giacomin DA Fonseca; Mauro Costa Morais Tavares; Raphael Martus Marcon; Alexandre Fogaça Cristante; Olavo Biraghi Letaif
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.513

9.  The accuracy of a method for printing three-dimensional spinal models.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Zhen-Xuan Shao; Jian-Shun Wang; Xin-Dong Yang; Wan-Qing Weng; Xiang-Yang Wang; Hua-Zi Xu; Yong-Long Chi; Zhong-Ke Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Surgical treatment for old subaxial cervical dislocation with bilateral locked facets in a 3-year-old girl: A case report.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Lei Li; Jingzhu Duan; Lijun Zhang; Zhenjiang Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.