Literature DB >> 21288791

Development of a rapid, 96-well alkaline based differential DNA extraction method for sexual assault evidence.

William R Hudlow1, Martin R Buoncristiani.   

Abstract

We present a rapid alkaline lysis procedure for the extraction of DNA from sexual assault evidence that generates purified sperm fraction extracts that yield STR typing results similar to those obtained from the traditional organic/dithiothreitol differential extraction. Specifically, a sodium hydroxide based differential extraction method has been developed in a single-tube format and further optimized in a 96-well format. The method yields purified extracts from a small sample set (≈ 2-6 swabs) in approximately 2h and from a larger sample set (up to 96 swabs) in approximately 4h. While conventional differential extraction methods require vigorous sample manipulation to remove the spermatozoa from the substrate, the method described here exploits the propensity of sperm to adhere to a substrate and does not require any manipulation of the substrate after it is sampled. For swabs, sample handling is minimized by employing a process where the tip of the swab, including the shaft, is transferred to the appropriate vessel eliminating the need for potentially hazardous scalpels to separate the swab material from the shaft. The absence of multiple handling steps allows the process to be semi-automated, however the procedure as described here does not require use of a robotic system. This method may provide forensic laboratories a cost-effective tool for the eradication of backlogs of sexual assault evidence, and more timely service to their client agencies. In addition, we have demonstrated that a modification of the procedure can be used to retrieve residual sperm-cell DNA from previously extracted swabs.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21288791     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  4 in total

1.  Forensic DNA research: keeping it real.

Authors:  Andrew John Hopwood; Keith Elliott
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Isolating DNA from sexual assault cases: a comparison of standard methods with a nuclease-based approach.

Authors:  Alex M Garvin; Andrea Fischer; Jutta Schnee-Griese; Andrea Jelinski; Michel Bottinelli; Gianni Soldati; Monica Tubio; Vincent Castella; Nathalie Monney; Naseem Malik; Michelle Madrid
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2012-12-04

3.  Current developments in forensic interpretation of mixed DNA samples (Review).

Authors:  Na Hu; Bin Cong; Shujin Li; Chunling Ma; Lihong Fu; Xiaojing Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2014-01-28

4.  Improved resolution of mixed STR profiles using a fully automated differential cell lysis/DNA extraction method.

Authors:  Matthew C Goldstein; Jordan O Cox; Lori B Seman; Tracey Dawson Cruz
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2019-08-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.