OBJECTIVE: To describe multidetector CT findings of "omental vascular pedicle" sign. MATERIALS AND METHODS: "Omental vascular pedicle" sign was defined as dilated omental vein associated with a mass located in omentum and was observed in 7 patients (5 women, 2 men). Mean age was 45 years. CT examinations and patient records were retrospectively reviewed. CT images were obtained by 16-MDCT (n = 1) and 64-dual source MDCT (n = 6). Curved planar and volume rendered images were reconstructed from axial images. Diameter of omental vein and drainage site were recorded. Images were evaluated by 2 radiologists in consensus. RESULTS: Pathologic diagnosis of patients with "omental vascular pedicle sign" was omental angiosarcoma (n = 1), endometrial adenocarcinoma (n = 2), ovarian serous adenocarcinoma (n = 2), mixed gonadal tumor (n = 1), malignant peripheral sheath tumor (n = 1). In 5 patients, omental vein drained into splenic vein and in 2 patients it drained into right gastroepiploic vein. Mean size of omental masses associated with omental vascular pedicle was 7.1 × 4.5 cm (range 15 × 11 cm to 2.7 × 1.6 cm). Mean diameter of omental vein was 3.1mm (range 6-1.5mm). Diameter of the omental vein increased with the increasing size of omental masses and Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.99. CONCLUSION: "Omental vascular pedicle sign" can be helpful to objectively diagnose omental masses in patients with primary and metastatic omental tumors.
OBJECTIVE: To describe multidetector CT findings of "omental vascular pedicle" sign. MATERIALS AND METHODS: "Omental vascular pedicle" sign was defined as dilated omental vein associated with a mass located in omentum and was observed in 7 patients (5 women, 2 men). Mean age was 45 years. CT examinations and patient records were retrospectively reviewed. CT images were obtained by 16-MDCT (n = 1) and 64-dual source MDCT (n = 6). Curved planar and volume rendered images were reconstructed from axial images. Diameter of omental vein and drainage site were recorded. Images were evaluated by 2 radiologists in consensus. RESULTS: Pathologic diagnosis of patients with "omental vascular pedicle sign" was omental angiosarcoma (n = 1), endometrial adenocarcinoma (n = 2), ovarian serous adenocarcinoma (n = 2), mixed gonadal tumor (n = 1), malignant peripheral sheath tumor (n = 1). In 5 patients, omental vein drained into splenic vein and in 2 patients it drained into right gastroepiploic vein. Mean size of omental masses associated with omental vascular pedicle was 7.1 × 4.5 cm (range 15 × 11 cm to 2.7 × 1.6 cm). Mean diameter of omental vein was 3.1mm (range 6-1.5mm). Diameter of the omental vein increased with the increasing size of omental masses and Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.99. CONCLUSION: "Omental vascular pedicle sign" can be helpful to objectively diagnose omental masses in patients with primary and metastatic omental tumors.