BACKGROUND: The optimal endoscopic investigation of diarrhea in patients under age 50 without specific features of right-sided colonic/ileal disease is inadequately defined. OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential additional yield of colonoscopy over flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) in this group. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two teaching hospital endoscopy units. PATIENTS: This study involved all patients under age 50 who had a colonoscopy between 1997 and 2007 to investigate diarrhea, without high-risk features of right-sided colonic/ileal disease, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), or rectal bleeding. INTERVENTION: Colonoscopy and biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Diagnostic yield of colonoscopy over FS with biopsy. RESULTS: Colonoscopic appearances were abnormal in 126 of 625 eligible patients (20%); 72% of abnormalities were within reach of FS. The most common endoscopic abnormality was suspected inflammation in 60 patients (10% overall), reportedly confined to the proximal colon or ileum in 22 patients (37% of this group). Histology from areas of suspected inflammation revealed features of IBD in 68% of patients, but results were normal in the remainder. In the 22 patients with suspected isolated proximal disease, 8 patients (36%) had normal histology results, and a further 6 had left-side colon biopsies demonstrating IBD. In patients with macroscopically normal colons, histological evidence of IBD or microscopic colitis occurred in 14 and 12 patients, respectively, with changes in the left side of the colon in 93% of patients. In this patient group, 85% of IBD or microscopic colitis could have been detected by FS and biopsy. The negative predictive value of FS with biopsy was 98% for IBD and 99% for microscopic colitis. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: FS is adequate for the investigation of diarrhea in patients under age 50 who lack other features, but its yield depends on biopsy of the left side of the colon.
BACKGROUND: The optimal endoscopic investigation of diarrhea in patients under age 50 without specific features of right-sided colonic/ileal disease is inadequately defined. OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential additional yield of colonoscopy over flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) in this group. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two teaching hospital endoscopy units. PATIENTS: This study involved all patients under age 50 who had a colonoscopy between 1997 and 2007 to investigate diarrhea, without high-risk features of right-sided colonic/ileal disease, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), or rectal bleeding. INTERVENTION: Colonoscopy and biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Diagnostic yield of colonoscopy over FS with biopsy. RESULTS: Colonoscopic appearances were abnormal in 126 of 625 eligible patients (20%); 72% of abnormalities were within reach of FS. The most common endoscopic abnormality was suspected inflammation in 60 patients (10% overall), reportedly confined to the proximal colon or ileum in 22 patients (37% of this group). Histology from areas of suspected inflammation revealed features of IBD in 68% of patients, but results were normal in the remainder. In the 22 patients with suspected isolated proximal disease, 8 patients (36%) had normal histology results, and a further 6 had left-side colon biopsies demonstrating IBD. In patients with macroscopically normal colons, histological evidence of IBD or microscopic colitis occurred in 14 and 12 patients, respectively, with changes in the left side of the colon in 93% of patients. In this patient group, 85% of IBD or microscopic colitis could have been detected by FS and biopsy. The negative predictive value of FS with biopsy was 98% for IBD and 99% for microscopic colitis. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: FS is adequate for the investigation of diarrhea in patients under age 50 who lack other features, but its yield depends on biopsy of the left side of the colon.
Authors: Ramesh P Arasaradnam; Steven Brown; Alastair Forbes; Mark R Fox; Pali Hungin; Lawrence Kelman; Giles Major; Michelle O'Connor; Dave S Sanders; Rakesh Sinha; Stephen Charles Smith; Paul Thomas; Julian R F Walters Journal: Gut Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Amanda J Cross; Kate Wooldrage; Emma C Robbins; Kevin Pack; Jeremy P Brown; William Hamilton; Michael R Thompson; Karen G Flashman; Steve Halligan; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Margaret Vance; Brian P Saunders; Wendy Atkin Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Anne-Marie Kanstrup Fiehn; Stephan Miehlke; Daniela Aust; Michael Vieth; Ole Bonderup; Fernando Fernández-Bañares; Emese Mihaly; Juozas Kupcinskas; Ahmed Madisch; Lars Kristian Munck; Tanju Nacak; Ralf Mohrbacher; Ralph Mueller; Roland Greinwald; Andreas Münch Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2020-09-12 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Stephan Miehlke; Danila Guagnozzi; Yamile Zabana; Gian E Tontini; Anne-Marie Kanstrup Fiehn; Signe Wildt; Johan Bohr; Ole Bonderup; Gerd Bouma; Mauro D'Amato; Peter J Heiberg Engel; Fernando Fernandez-Banares; Gilles Macaigne; Henrik Hjortswang; Elisabeth Hultgren-Hörnquist; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Jouzas Kupcinskas; Stefania Landolfi; Giovanni Latella; Alfredo Lucendo; Ivan Lyutakov; Ahmed Madisch; Fernando Magro; Wojciech Marlicz; Emese Mihaly; Lars K Munck; Ann-Elisabeth Ostvik; Árpád V Patai; Plamen Penchev; Karolina Skonieczna-Żydecka; Bas Verhaegh; Andreas Münch Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 4.623