Literature DB >> 21287479

Comparison between Ultroid and rubber band ligation in treatment of internal hemorrhoids.

Rasoul Azizi1, Behzad Rabani-Karizi, Mohammad Ali Taghipour.   

Abstract

Hemorrhoid is one of the most common surgical diseases and different methods are available for its treatment. This study is a comparison between two methods of treatment of internal hemorrhoid, Monopolar low voltage instrument (Ultroid) and Rubber Band Ligation. This method has been carried out prospectively in which 50 patients who were treated with rubber band ligation and 50 patients with Ultroid were compared according to the incidence of complications, post-operative pain and treatment response. According to this study complete success rate with Ultroid was 82% and partial success rate was 10% and no response to treatment was seen in 8%. In Rubber Band method the complete response rate was 94% (P=0.2). With Ultroid, 74% of patient reported no postoperative pain, 24% reported mild and moderate pain and 2% of patients complained of severe pain. With Rubber band ligation, 72% of patients reported no post-operative pain, 26% reported mild and moderate pain and 1% complained of severe pain (P=0.00). Rubber Band ligation and Ultroid are both considered as outpatient procedures for treatment of hemorrhoids. Both methods are mostly used for grade 1, 2 and sometime grade 3 hemorrhoids. In Ultroid method the operator is required to hold the probe for a period of time, and in most cases, the surgeon should spend between 20-25 minutes for the coagulation of three piles. Some surgeons do not have patience for this modality of internal hemorrhoid treatment. In this study we achieved acceptable results comparable with those of other techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21287479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Med Iran        ISSN: 0044-6025


  5 in total

1.  The non-surgical management for hemorrhoidal disease. A systematic review.

Authors:  G Cocorullo; R Tutino; N Falco; L Licari; G Orlando; T Fontana; C Raspanti; G Salamone; G Scerrino; G Gallo; M Trompetto; G Gulotta
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  The Evaluation and Office Management of Hemorrhoids for the Gastroenterologist.

Authors:  Mitchel Guttenplan
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-07

3.  Portuguese Society of Gastroenterology Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease.

Authors:  Paulo Salgueiro; Ana Célia Caetano; Ana Maria Oliveira; Bruno Rosa; Miguel Mascarenhas-Saraiva; Paula Ministro; Pedro Amaro; Rogério Godinho; Rosa Coelho; Rúben Gaio; Samuel Fernandes; Vítor Fernandes; Fernando Castro-Poças
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09-05

4.  Direct current electrotherapy for internal haemorrhoids: experience in a tertiary health institution.

Authors:  Samuel Olatoke; Moses Adeoti; Olayide Agodirin; Abdulwahab Ajape; John Agbola
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2014-06-17

Review 5.  Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.

Authors:  G Gallo; J Martellucci; A Sturiale; G Clerico; G Milito; F Marino; G Cocorullo; P Giordano; M Mistrangelo; M Trompetto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.781

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.