Literature DB >> 21287069

Individual and sex differences in reminiscence.

K L Huang1, R B Payne.   

Abstract

Inverted alphabet printing, rotary pursuit, and mirror tracking tasks were administered to 84 subjects in order to ascertain (a) reproducibility of reminiscence scores within and between tasks and (b)sex differences in reminiscence. With prerest performance levels held constant by second-order partial correlation procedures, reproducibility of individual reminiscence differences within tasks was significant but quite low, while predictability of reminiscence from one task to another was negligible. The sexes reminisced essentially alike on inverted alphabet printing, but females reminisced more than males on the other tasks, presumably because they were relatively more depressed by massed practice on these tasks. Thus, individual and sex differences were essentially task specific. Implications of results for reminiscence theories and for the credibility of alleged relationships between reminiscence and other organismic variables were discussed.

Year:  1975        PMID: 21287069     DOI: 10.3758/BF03212907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  11 in total

1.  A THREE-FACTOR THEORY OF REMINISCENCE.

Authors:  H J EYSENCK
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1965-08

2.  Rotary pursuit performance as related to sex and age of pre-adult subjects.

Authors:  R B AMMONS; S I ALPRIN; C H AMMONS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1955-02

3.  Effect of distribution of practice on a component skill of rotary pursuit tracking.

Authors:  E J ARCHER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-11

4.  Reminiscence, drive, and personality theory.

Authors:  H J EYSENCK
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1956-11

5.  Reminiscence in motor learning as a function of length of interpolated rest.

Authors:  G A KIMBLE; B R HORENSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-06

6.  An experimental test of a two-factor theory of inhibition.

Authors:  G A KIMBLE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1949-02

7.  Reminiscence in pursuit-rotor learning as a function of length of rest and of amount of pre-rest practice.

Authors:  A L IRION
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1949-08

8.  Facilitation of psychomotor learning by classically differentiated supplementary feedback cues.

Authors:  R B Payne; C W Artley
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 1.328

9.  A note on alleged individual differences in reminiscence and extraversion-introversion.

Authors:  E N Peters
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Nonexistent individual differences in reminiscence.

Authors:  E N Peters
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.