Literature DB >> 21287036

Understanding sentences with relative clauses.

D T Hakes1, J S Evans, L L Brannon.   

Abstract

Sentences containing self-embedded relative clauses are generally believed to be difficult to understand because such clauses interrupt the clauses in which they are embedded. However, the experiments that purport to have demonstrated this have confounded the self-embedded or fight-branching location of the relative clauses with their internal structure, comparing self-embedded object relatives with right-branching subject relatives. In order to break this confounding, Experiment I compared the comprehension difficulty of self-embedded and right-branching object relative clauses on two measures of comprehension difficulty. Experiment II made the same self-embedded vs. fight-branching comparison for subject relative clauses. The results of both experiments consistently failed to support the interruption hypothesis.

Year:  1976        PMID: 21287036     DOI: 10.3758/BF03213177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  Effects of local and global context on processing sentences with subject and object relative clauses.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Lun Mo; Max M Louwerse
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-06

Review 2.  The neurobiology of syntax: beyond string sets.

Authors:  Karl Magnus Petersson; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Processing multiple non-adjacent dependencies: evidence from sequence learning.

Authors:  Meinou H de Vries; Karl Magnus Petersson; Sebastian Geukes; Pienie Zwitserlood; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Searching for the trace: the influence of age, lexical activation and working memory on sentence processing.

Authors:  Anthony J Angwin; Helen J Chenery; David A Copland; Elizabeth A Cardell; Bruce E Murdoch; John C L Ingram
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-01

5.  Robust effects of working memory demand during naturalistic language comprehension in language-selective cortex.

Authors:  Cory Shain; Idan A Blank; Evelina Fedorenko; Edward Gibson; William Schuler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  "Whatdunit?" Sentence Comprehension Abilities of Children With SLI: Sensitivity to Word Order in Canonical and Noncanonical Structures.

Authors:  James W Montgomery; Ronald B Gillam; Julia L Evans; Alexander V Sergeev
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 7.  The language faculty that wasn't: a usage-based account of natural language recursion.

Authors:  Morten H Christiansen; Nick Chater
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-27

8.  MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference.

Authors:  Kimberly Leiken; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2013-12-05

9.  Filling Predictable and Unpredictable Gaps, with and without Similarity-Based Interference: Evidence for LIFG Effects of Dependency Processing.

Authors:  Kimberly Leiken; Brian McElree; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.