Literature DB >> 21287001

Temporal characteristics of primary-secondary message interference in a dichotic listening task.

B A Ambler1, S A Fisicaro, R W Proctor.   

Abstract

Previous experiments have shown that during performance of a shadowing task the unattended message is processed at a semantic level. Four experiments are reported that deal with the question of how processing of the unattended message influences the difficulty of shadowing the attended message. Experiment I demonstrated that pupil dilation measures the difficulty associated with a shadowing task. In Experiment II it was shown that during shadowing of 20-item lists pupil dilation decreases as shadowing continues when either words or white noise are in the unattended channel. These results support the idea that it takes time for the attentional mechanism to focus on the attended message. In Experiments III and IV it was found that this decrease in difficulty of shadowing is much less when the attended and unattended messages come from the same stimulus category (letter-letter, digit-digit). The results indicate that, when the unattended message is from the same stimulus category as the attended message, it can interfere with the ability of the attentional system to focus on the attended message.

Year:  1976        PMID: 21287001     DOI: 10.3758/BF03213238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  Some theoretical considerations.

Authors:  J A DEUTSCH; D DEUTSCH
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving.

Authors:  E H Hess; J M Polt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-03-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Semantic processing in dichotic listening? A replication.

Authors:  A Treisman; R Squire; J Green
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1974-07

4.  Autonomic responses to shock-associated words in an unattended channel.

Authors:  R S Corteen; B Wood
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-08

5.  Psychological significance of pupillary movements.

Authors:  B C Goldwater
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Perceptual attenuation of an irrelevant auditory verbal input as measured by an involuntary verbal response in a selective-attention task.

Authors:  T Zelniker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-01

Review 7.  Strategies and models of selective attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Semantic processing of unattended messages using dichotic listening.

Authors:  J L Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-08

9.  Pupil diameter and load on memory.

Authors:  D Kahneman; J Beatty
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Thomas Koelewijn; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.