Literature DB >> 21286962

Effects of fundamental frequency contrast on discrimination and identification of dichotic CV syllables at various temporal delays.

B H Repp1.   

Abstract

Dichotic CV syllables (identical and nonidentical pairs) were presented at nine temporal offsets between 0 and 500 msec. One task consisted in judging quickly whether the syllables in a pair were phonetically the same or different; the other task was to identify both syllables. The fundamental frequency (pitch) of the synthetic stimuli was either the same or different, and either predictable or unpredictable. The pitch variable had surprisingly little effect on the latencies of "same"-"different" judgments, and the expected "preparation" effect of pitch predictability was ba]rely present. Instead, there were strong effects on the frequencies of errors at short temporal delays, which suggests shifts or biases in the phonetic "same"-"different" criterion with context. A comparison with analogous errors in the identification task revealed identical patterns. Further analysis of identification errors showed no overall "feature sharing advantage": The direction of this effect depends on the kind of error committed. Also, a lag effect was found only in nonidentical pairs that received two identical responses. The results are discussed in the framework of a two-stage information-processing model. Effects of pitch are tentatively explained as biases from implicit (pitch) decisions at the auditory level on phonetic decisions in the presence of uncertainty. Four sources of errors are identified: fusion at the auditory level; "integration," confusions, and transpositions at the phonetic level.

Year:  1976        PMID: 21286962     DOI: 10.3758/BF03213258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  18 in total

1.  Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; Jeffrey Tash
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1974

2.  Dichotic Interactions of Speech Sounds and Phonetic Feature Processing.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; Sandra D McNabb
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Perceptual units in speech recognition.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-02

4.  Visual and auditory coding in a memory matching task.

Authors:  L E Wood
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-01

5.  Multidimensional analysis of choice reaction time judgments on pairs of English fricatives.

Authors:  F F Weiner; S Singh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-04

6.  Dichotic speech perception: an interpretation of right-ear advantage and temporal offset effects.

Authors:  C I Berlin; S S Lowe-Bell; J K CULLEN; C L Thompson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Experiments with the stimulus suffix effect.

Authors:  J Morton; R G Crowder; H A Prussin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-11

9.  Hemispheric specialization for speech perception.

Authors:  M Studdert-Kennedy; D Shankweiler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Retention of visual and name codes of single letters.

Authors:  M I Posner; S J Boies; W H Eichelman; R L Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Against a role of "chirp" identification in duplex perception.

Authors:  B H Repp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.