Literature DB >> 21286957

Invariance of the weight parameter in information integration.

I P Levin1, K J Kim, F A Corry.   

Abstract

The relative effect of each informational dimension in an information integration task is a joint function of its weight and the range of values over which it is varied. A method is developed for separating these two factors. Weights obtained by this method were compared across variations of stimulus range. Subjects rated the performance of students on the basis of midterm exam scores and final exam scores. For some subjects, the range of scores on the final exam was twice that on the midterm and the reverse was true for other subjects. An averaging model was shown to describe the results, and weights did not differ for different stimulus ranges. This was true for each of two instructional conditions: one in which a particular weighting strategy was prescribed and one in which there was no prescribed weighting. Students who were instructed to use a 2∶1 weighting were found to assign more than twice as much weight to the final as to the midterm.

Year:  1976        PMID: 21286957     DOI: 10.3758/BF03213253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  6 in total

1.  Response scale effects and integration processes in the averaging of motor movements.

Authors:  I P Levin; K L Norman; J M Dolezal
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Averaging processes in ratings and choices based on numerical information.

Authors:  I P Levin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1974-07

3.  Dynamic processes in stimulus integration theory: effects of feedback on averaging of motor movements.

Authors:  K L Norman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-03

4.  Differential weighting of positive and negative traits in impression formation as a function of prior exposure.

Authors:  I P Levin; L L Wall; J M Dolezal; K L Norman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-01

5.  Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation.

Authors:  N H Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-10

6.  Learning effects in information integration: Manipulation of cue validity in an impression formation task.

Authors:  I P Levin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1973-09
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  The processing of deviant information in prediction and evaluation.

Authors:  I P Levin; J R Ims; J C Simpson; K J Kim
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.