Literature DB >> 21285784

Craniofacial microsomia soft-tissue reconstruction comparison: inframammary extended circumflex scapular flap versus serial fat grafting.

Neil Tanna1, Derrick C Wan, Henry K Kawamoto, James P Bradley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors investigated the use of serial autologous fat grafting to restore soft-tissue contour in craniofacial microsomia patients.
METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe craniofacial microsomia were divided into two groups. Microvascular free flap patients had reconstruction with inframammary extended circumflex scapular flaps at skeletal maturity (n = 10). Alternatively, patients had fat grafting during multiple staged operations for mandible and ear reconstruction (n = 21). Sex, age, severity of deformity [determined by OMENS (orbital deformity, mandibular hypoplasia, ear deformity, nerve involvement, and soft-tissue deficiency) classification], number of procedures, operative times, and augmentation volumes were recorded. A digital three-dimensional photogrammetry system was used to determine "final fat take" and symmetry (affected side versus unaffected side). Physician and patient satisfaction were elicited.
RESULTS: Microvascular free flap and fat grafting groups had similar OMENS scores, 2.4 and 2.3, and similar mean prereconstruction symmetry scores, 74 percent and 75 percent, respectively. Although the mean number of procedures was less for the microvascular free flap group versus the fat grafting group (2.2 versus 4.3), the combined surgical time was greater for the microvascular free flap group. The complication rate for the microvascular free flap group was 12 percent and that for the fat grafting group was 5 percent. The mean microvascular free flap volume implanted was 131 cc, with a final measured volume of 106 cc. Mean fat grafting volume injected per case was 33 cc, with total fat injections of 146 cc and a final measured volume of 121 cc. There was a mean fat loss of 25 cc and 83 percent fat take. Symmetry score was 121 percent for the microvascular free flap group and 99 percent for the fat grafting group. No statistically significant difference in patient or physician satisfaction was noted.
CONCLUSION: Serial fat grafting provided a useful alternative to microvascular free tissue transfer after skeletal reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21285784     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed6e4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  13 in total

1.  Free dermal fat graft for restoration of soft tissue defects in maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  N Girish Kumar; G K Thapliyal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-04-25

Review 2.  Applications of Fat Grafting in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Linden Shih; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Matthew J Davis; Amy S Xue; Robert F Dempsey; Edward P Buchanan
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Fat Grafting into Younger Recipients Improves Volume Retention in an Animal Model.

Authors:  Natalie N Chung; Ryan C Ransom; Charles P Blackshear; Dre M Irizarry; Derek Yen; Arash Momeni; Gordon K Lee; Dung H Nguyen; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Fat Transfer in Facial Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Todor K Krastev; Jip Beugels; Juliette Hommes; Andrzej Piatkowski; Irene Mathijssen; Rene van der Hulst
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.611

5.  Senescence of donor cells impairs fat graft regeneration by suppressing adipogenesis and increasing expression of senescence-associated secretory phenotype factors.

Authors:  Xihang Chen; Jingwei Feng; Qiang Chang; Feng Lu; Yi Yuan
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 6.832

6.  Rapamycin and 3-Methyladenine Influence the Apoptosis, Senescence, and Adipogenesis of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells by Promoting and Inhibiting Autophagy: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Le Du; Guodong Song; Xianlei Zong; Xiaolei Jin; Xiaonan Yang; Zuoliang Qi
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 7.  A systemic review of autologous fat grafting survival rate and related severe complications.

Authors:  Nan-Ze Yu; Jiu-Zuo Huang; Hao Zhang; Yang Wang; Xiao-Jun Wang; Ru Zhao; Ming Bai; Xiao Long
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 8.  Volume Retention After Facial Fat Grafting and Relevant Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qianwen Lv; Xin Li; Yue Qi; Yunpeng Gu; Zhenjun Liu; Gui-E Ma
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 9.  The Current State of Fat Grafting: A Review of Harvesting, Processing, and Injection Techniques.

Authors:  Amy L Strong; Paul S Cederna; J Peter Rubin; Sydney R Coleman; Benjamin Levi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Adipose matrix complex: a high-rigidity collagen-rich adipose-derived material for fat grafting.

Authors:  Ye Li; Pan Zhang; Xue Zhang; Xin Bi; Mengfan Wu; Jialiang Zou; Zijue Wang; Feng Lu; Ziqing Dong; Jianhua Gao
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.