Literature DB >> 21285427

Clinician integrity and limits to patient autonomy.

John Lantos1, Ann Marie Matlock, David Wendler.   

Abstract

A 28-year-old man with chronic granulomatous disease developed worsening respiratory status in the setting of chronic bacterial and fungal infections. The attending physician recommended transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU), but the patient declined. The patient understood that the nurses in the ICU have expertise in caring for patients with poor respiratory function. He also understood that he faced an increased risk of dying if he remained on the medical ward. At the same time, the patient was familiar with the nurses on the medical ward and felt comfortable there. Unsure of whether it was appropriate for clinicians to agree to provide less than optimal care for a critically ill patient, the clinicians on the medical ward requested a bioethics consultation. This article reviews the ethical issues that arise when patients ask clinicians to provide less than optimal care. Although it is well established that clinicians ought to respect patient autonomy, that obligation conflicted, in the present case, with the clinicians' sense of professional integrity. Future research on this vital but underexplored topic is needed to determine the extent to which clinicians' professional integrity places limits on the types of patient requests to which they should agree.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21285427     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  9 in total

1.  Guidelines for the treatment of hypothyroidism: prepared by the american thyroid association task force on thyroid hormone replacement.

Authors:  Jacqueline Jonklaas; Antonio C Bianco; Andrew J Bauer; Kenneth D Burman; Anne R Cappola; Francesco S Celi; David S Cooper; Brian W Kim; Robin P Peeters; M Sara Rosenthal; Anna M Sawka
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.568

2.  Compliance with treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Raili Müller; Riina Kallikorm; Kaja Põlluste; Margus Lember
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Health-care needs and shared decision-making in priority-setting.

Authors:  Erik Gustavsson; Lars Sandman
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-02

4.  Association of patient preferences for participation in decision making with length of stay and costs among hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Hyo Jung Tak; Gregory W Ruhnke; David O Meltzer
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Market liberalism in health care: a dysfunctional view of respecting "consumer" autonomy.

Authors:  Michael A Kekewich
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Medical decision and patient's preference: 'much ethics' and more trust always needed.

Authors:  Dimitrios Anyfantakis; Emmanouil K Symvoulakis
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Health Outcome Prioritization in Alzheimer's Disease: Understanding the Ethical Landscape.

Authors:  Alex McKeown; Andrew Turner; Zuzanna Angehrn; Dianne Gove; Amanda Ly; Clementine Nordon; Mia Nelson; Claire Tochel; Brent Mittelstadt; Alex Keenan; Michael Smith; Ilina Singh
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

8.  Comparison of ethical judgments exhibited by clients and ethics consultants in Japan.

Authors:  Noriko Nagao; Yasuhiro Kadooka; Atsushi Asai
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Ethics of Codes and Codes of Ethics: When Is It Ethical to Provide Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Authors:  Piroska K Kopar; Douglas E Brown; Isaiah R Turnbull
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 13.787

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.