Literature DB >> 21285117

Performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with 1987 ACR criteria in a very early synovitis cohort.

Mohammed Z Cader1, Andrew Filer, Jonathan Hazlehurst, Paola de Pablo, Christopher D Buckley, Karim Raza.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Early identification of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is essential to allow the prompt institution of therapy. The 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria, which replace the 1987 classification criteria, have been developed to facilitate such identification in patients with newly presenting inflammatory arthritis. This study therefore assesses the performance of these new criteria in patients with early synovitis.
METHODS: Data were analysed from patients with synovitis seen within 3 months of the onset of inflammatory arthritis. Patients were followed for 18 months to determine outcomes, and data on the cumulative fulfilment of 2010 and 1987 criteria and therapy were recorded.
RESULTS: 265 patients were included in the study. 60 had alternative diagnoses at baseline. Of the remaining 205 patients, 20% fulfilled both 1987 and 2010 criteria, 3% fulfilled only 1987 criteria and 22% fulfilled only 2010 criteria at baseline. The 2010 criteria, when applied at baseline, detected more patients who eventually required disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) (65 (62%) vs 40 (38%); p<0.001), especially methotrexate (50 (68%) vs 31 (42%); p<0.01), within the first 18 months. However, more patients whose disease eventually resolved without ever requiring DMARD were classified at baseline as RA according to the 2010 criteria than with the 1987 criteria (16 (8%) vs 5 (2%); p=0.01).
CONCLUSION: The 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria allow more rapid identification of patients requiring methotrexate compared with the 1987 ACR criteria when applied at baseline. However, overdiagnosis is an important issue to consider if these criteria are to be used in very early disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21285117     DOI: 10.1136/ard.2010.143560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  32 in total

Review 1.  Treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis and prevention of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Kristen Demoruelle; Kevin D Deane
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  The new 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria as predictor of clinical and radiographic response in patients with early arthritis.

Authors:  R B Mueller; M Schiff; T Kaegi; A Finckh; S R Haile; H Schulze-Koops; J von Kempis
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  [German 2012 guidelines for the sequential medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Adapted EULAR recommendations and updated treatment algorithm].

Authors:  K Krüger; J Wollenhaupt; K Albrecht; R Alten; M Backhaus; C Baerwald; W Bolten; J Braun; H Burkhardt; G Burmester; M Gaubitz; A Gause; E Gromnica-Ihle; H Kellner; J Kuipers; A Krause; H-M Lorenz; B Manger; H Nüßlein; H-G Pott; A Rubbert-Roth; M Schneider; C Specker; H Schulze-Koops; H-P Tony; S Wassenberg; U Müller-Ladner
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  The 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in the Heinola inception cohort--diagnoses confirmed by long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Kalevi Kaarela; Jenni E Kauppi; Markku J Kauppi
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Comparison of three classification criteria of rheumatoid arthritis in an inception early arthritis cohort.

Authors:  Hua Ye; Yin Su; Ru Li; Jinxia Zhao; Xiangyuan Liu; Yifang Mei; Zhiyi Zhang; Jialong Guo; Liqi Bi; Xia Liu; Guochun Wang; Jinjing Liu; Xiaomei Leng; Fei Gu; Lingyun Sun; Qinghua Zou; Yongfei Fang; Quan Jiang; Zhanguo Li
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Additive value for ultrasonographic signal in a screening algorithm for patients presenting with acute mono-/oligoarthritis in whom gout is suspected.

Authors:  F B G Lamers-Karnebeek; P L C M Van Riel; T L Jansen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Comparison of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology and the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism criteria for classification of rheumatoid arthritis in the Nurses' Health Study cohorts.

Authors:  Shanthini Kasturi; Barbara L Goldstein; Susan Malspeis; Elizabeth W Karlson; Karen H Costenbader
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  Rheumatoid arthritis is getting less frequent-results of a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Abhishek Abhishek; Michael Doherty; Chang-Fu Kuo; Christian D Mallen; Weiya Zhang; Matthew J Grainge
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Performance of the 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Garifallia Sakellariou; Carlo Alberto Scirè; Antonella Zambon; Roberto Caporali; Carlomaurizio Montecucco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Utility of the new rheumatoid arthritis 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in routine clinical care.

Authors:  Lauren Kennish; Monalyn Labitigan; Sam Budoff; Maria T Filopoulos; W Andrew McCracken; Christopher J Swearingen; Yusuf Yazici
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.