Literature DB >> 21285101

A comparison of participant information elicited by service user and non-service user researchers.

Diana Rose1, Morven Leese, Danielle Oliver, Rajinder Sidhu, Olive Bennewith, Stefan Priebe, Til Wykes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study examined whether data collected by researchers who were service users differed from data collected by non-service user researchers in a study that measured perceived coercion.
METHODS: Over two years, 548 inpatients in England were interviewed during their first week of compulsory admission to a psychiatric bed at three regional mental health provider settings. Each site had one service user researcher and one nonuser researcher. The dependent variables were two measures of perceived coercion. Service users disclosed their status, including past hospitalization, to 93 of the 242 (38%) patients they interviewed.
RESULTS: No differences were found on either variable between the three researcher categories (nondisclosed user, disclosed user, and nonuser researcher). An interaction with site was noted, and possible interpretations of this finding are discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to determine the conditions under which service user researchers obtain information that differs from that obtained by nonuser researchers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21285101     DOI: 10.1176/ps.62.2.pss6202_0210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Serv        ISSN: 1075-2730            Impact factor:   3.084


  5 in total

1.  Involving service users in the Birth Timing project, a data linkage study analysing the timing of births and their outcomes.

Authors:  Mary Newburn; Miranda Scanlon; Rachel Plachcinski; Alison Jill Macfarlane
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2020-11-02

2.  VOICE: developing a new measure of service users' perceptions of inpatient care, using a participatory methodology.

Authors:  Jo Evans; Diana Rose; Clare Flach; Emese Csipke; Helen Glossop; Paul McCrone; Tom Craig; Til Wykes
Journal:  J Ment Health       Date:  2012-02

3.  Getting it right! Enhancing youth involvement in mental health research.

Authors:  Lauren Mawn; Patrick Welsh; Lauren Kirkpatrick; Lisa A D Webster; Helen J Stain
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Service users as collaborators in mental health research: less stick, more carrot.

Authors:  K Staley; T Kabir; G Szmukler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  Traditions of research in community mental health care planning and care coordination: A systematic meta-narrative review of the literature.

Authors:  Aled Jones; Ben Hannigan; Michael Coffey; Alan Simpson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.