Literature DB >> 21284003

Analyzing the robustness of the MM/PBSA free energy calculation method: application to DNA conformational transitions.

Allyn R Brice1, Brian N Dominy.   

Abstract

The ability to predict and characterize free energy differences associated with conformational equilibria or the binding of biomolecules is vital to understanding the molecular basis of many important biological functions. As biological studies focus on larger molecular complexes and properties of the genome, proteome, and interactome, the development and characterization of efficient methods for calculating free energy becomes increasingly essential. The aim of this study is to examine the robustness of the end-point free energy method termed the molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann solvent accessible surface area (MM/PBSA) method. Specifically, applications of MM/PBSA to the conformational equilibria of nucleic acid (NA) systems are explored. This is achieved by comparing A to B form DNA conformational free energy differences calculated using MM/PBSA with corresponding free energy differences determined with a more rigorous and time-consuming umbrella sampling algorithm. In addition, the robustness of NA MM/PBSA calculations is also evaluated in terms of the sensitivity towards the choice of force field and the choice of solvent model used during conformational sampling. MM/PBSA calculations of the free energy difference between A-form and B-form DNA are shown to be in very close agreement with the PMF result determined using an umbrella sampling approach. Further, it is found that the MM/PBSA conformational free energy differences were also in agreement using either the CHARMM or AMBER force field. The influence of ionic strength on conformational stability was particularly insensitive to the choice of force field. Finally, it is also shown that the use of a generalized Born implicit solvent during conformational sampling results in free energy estimates that deviate slightly from those obtained using explicitly solvated MD simulations in these NA systems.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21284003     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  21 in total

1.  Molecular modeling of nucleic acid structure: setup and analysis.

Authors:  T E Cheatham; B R Brooks; P A Kollman
Journal:  Curr Protoc Nucleic Acid Chem       Date:  2001-11

2.  Numerical interpretation of molecular surface field in dielectric modeling of solvation.

Authors:  Changhao Wang; Li Xiao; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Exploring a multi-scale method for molecular simulation in continuum solvent model: Explicit simulation of continuum solvent as an incompressible fluid.

Authors:  Li Xiao; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Robustness and Efficiency of Poisson-Boltzmann Modeling on Graphics Processing Units.

Authors:  Ruxi Qi; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Acceleration of Linear Finite-Difference Poisson-Boltzmann Methods on Graphics Processing Units.

Authors:  Ruxi Qi; Wesley M Botello-Smith; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Modeling Membrane Protein-Ligand Binding Interactions: The Human Purinergic Platelet Receptor.

Authors:  D'Artagnan Greene; Wesley M Botello-Smith; Alec Follmer; Li Xiao; Eleftherios Lambros; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  A Continuum Poisson-Boltzmann Model for Membrane Channel Proteins.

Authors:  Li Xiao; Jianxiong Diao; D'Artagnan Greene; Junmei Wang; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Electrostatic component of binding energy: Interpreting predictions from poisson-boltzmann equation and modeling protocols.

Authors:  Arghya Chakavorty; Lin Li; Emil Alexov
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Calculating protein-ligand binding affinities with MMPBSA: Method and error analysis.

Authors:  Changhao Wang; Peter H Nguyen; Kevin Pham; Danielle Huynh; Thanh-Binh Nancy Le; Hongli Wang; Pengyu Ren; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Effects of hypoxanthine substitution in peptide nucleic acids targeting KRAS2 oncogenic mRNA molecules: theory and experiment.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Sanders; Matthew E Wampole; Chang-Po Chen; Dalip Sethi; Amrita Singh; François-Yves Dupradeau; Fan Wang; Brian D Gray; Mathew L Thakur; Eric Wickstrom
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.