Literature DB >> 2128379

A comparative study of methods of estimating renal size in normal adults.

V T Ninan1, K T Koshi, M M Niyamthullah, C K Jacob, G Gopalakrishnan, A P Pandey, J C Shastry.   

Abstract

One hundred live related voluntary kidney donors were studied prospectively. During donor nephrectomy the actual kidney bipolar length was measured and compared to the renal bipolar length estimated from abdominal sonogram, abdominal plain X-ray, intravenous pyelogram, and renal angiogram. Ultrasound was found to measure the kidney more accurately (mean difference between estimated size and actual = -3.4 mm +/- SD 6.96), than plain X-ray (mean difference from actual 13mm +/- SD 5.24), IVP (mean difference from actual 16.9 mm +/- SD 5.74), and renal angiogram (mean difference from actual 15.2 mm +/- SD 5.77).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2128379     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/5.10.851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  4 in total

1.  Measurement of renal dimensions in vivo: A critical appraisal.

Authors:  H Krishna Moorthy; P Venugopal
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-04

2.  Need for a nomogram of renal sizes in the Indian population- findings from a single centre sonographic study.

Authors:  Prakash Muthusami; Ramesh Ananthakrishnan; Poyyamoli Santosh
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  The evaluation and comparison of kidney length obtained from axial cuts in spiral CT scan with its true length.

Authors:  Mehdi Karami; Farshad Rahimi; Mohammadhasan Tajadini
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2015-01-30

Review 4.  Homeostatic Signaling by Cell-Cell Junctions and Its Dysregulation during Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Randolph C Elble
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.