BACKGROUND: Few data are available describing atazanavir exposure during pregnancy, especially when used in combination with tenofovir, whose coadministration with atazanavir results in decreased atazanavir exposure. DESIGN: International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials 1026 s is an ongoing, prospective, nonblinded study of antiretroviral pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected pregnant women that included 2 cohorts receiving atazanavir/ritonavir 300 mg/100 mg once daily, either with or without tenofovir. METHODS: Intensive steady-state 24-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were performed during the third trimester and at 6-12 weeks postpartum. Atazanavir was measured by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (detection limit 0.047 mcg/mL). Pharmacokinetic targets were the estimated 10th percentile atazanavir area under the concentration versus time curve [(AUC): 29.4 mcg · hr · mL-1] in nonpregnant historical controls (mean AUC = 57 mcg · hr · mL-1) and a trough concentration of 0.15 mcg/mL, the concentration target used in therapeutic drug monitoring programs. RESULTS: Median atazanavir AUC was reduced during the third trimester compared with postpartum for subjects not receiving tenofovir (41.9 vs. 57.9 mcg · hr · mL-1, P = 0.02) and for subjects receiving tenofovir (28.8 vs. 39.6 mcg · hr · mL-1, P = 0.04). During the third trimester, AUC was below the target in 33% (6 of 18) of women not receiving tenofovir and 55% (11 of 20) of women receiving tenofovir. Trough concentration was below the target in 6% (1 of 18) of women not receiving tenofovir and 15% (3 of 20) of women receiving tenofovir. The median (range) ratio of cord blood/maternal atazanavir concentration in 29-paired samples was 0.18 (0-0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Atazanavir exposure is reduced by pregnancy and by concomitant tenofovir use. A dose increase of atazanavir/ritonavir to 400 mg/100 mg may be necessary in pregnant women to ensure atazanavir exposure equivalent to that seen in nonpregnant adults.
BACKGROUND: Few data are available describing atazanavir exposure during pregnancy, especially when used in combination with tenofovir, whose coadministration with atazanavir results in decreased atazanavir exposure. DESIGN: International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials 1026 s is an ongoing, prospective, nonblinded study of antiretroviral pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected pregnant women that included 2 cohorts receiving atazanavir/ritonavir 300 mg/100 mg once daily, either with or without tenofovir. METHODS: Intensive steady-state 24-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were performed during the third trimester and at 6-12 weeks postpartum. Atazanavir was measured by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (detection limit 0.047 mcg/mL). Pharmacokinetic targets were the estimated 10th percentile atazanavir area under the concentration versus time curve [(AUC): 29.4 mcg · hr · mL-1] in nonpregnant historical controls (mean AUC = 57 mcg · hr · mL-1) and a trough concentration of 0.15 mcg/mL, the concentration target used in therapeutic drug monitoring programs. RESULTS: Median atazanavir AUC was reduced during the third trimester compared with postpartum for subjects not receiving tenofovir (41.9 vs. 57.9 mcg · hr · mL-1, P = 0.02) and for subjects receiving tenofovir (28.8 vs. 39.6 mcg · hr · mL-1, P = 0.04). During the third trimester, AUC was below the target in 33% (6 of 18) of women not receiving tenofovir and 55% (11 of 20) of women receiving tenofovir. Trough concentration was below the target in 6% (1 of 18) of women not receiving tenofovir and 15% (3 of 20) of women receiving tenofovir. The median (range) ratio of cord blood/maternal atazanavir concentration in 29-paired samples was 0.18 (0-0.45). CONCLUSIONS:Atazanavir exposure is reduced by pregnancy and by concomitant tenofovir use. A dose increase of atazanavir/ritonavir to 400 mg/100 mg may be necessary in pregnant women to ensure atazanavir exposure equivalent to that seen in nonpregnant adults.
Authors: P Villani; M Floridia; M F Pirillo; M Cusato; E Tamburrini; A F Cavaliere; G Guaraldi; C Vanzini; A Molinari; A degli Antoni; M Regazzi Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Alice M Stek; Mark Mirochnick; Edmund Capparelli; Brookie M Best; Chengcheng Hu; Sandra K Burchett; Carol Elgie; Diane T Holland; Elizabeth Smith; Ruth Tuomala; Amanda Cotter; Jennifer S Read Journal: AIDS Date: 2006-10-03 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Jashvant D Unadkat; Diane W Wara; Michael D Hughes; Anita A Mathias; Diane T Holland; Mary E Paul; James Connor; Sharon Huang; Bach-Yen Nguyen; D Heather Watts; Lynne M Mofenson; Elizabeth Smith; Paul Deutsch; Kathleen A Kaiser; Ruth E Tuomala Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2006-12-11 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Y J Bryson; M Mirochnick; A Stek; L M Mofenson; J Connor; E Capparelli; D H Watts; S Huang; M D Hughes; K Kaiser; L Purdue; Y Asfaw; M Keller; E Smith Journal: HIV Clin Trials Date: 2008 Mar-Apr
Authors: J S Read; B M Best; A M Stek; C Hu; E V Capparelli; D T Holland; S K Burchett; M E Smith; E C Sheeran; W T Shearer; I Febo; M Mirochnick Journal: HIV Med Date: 2008-09-14 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: R M M Cleijsen; M E van de Ende; F P Kroon; F Verduyn Lunel; P P Koopmans; L Gras; F de Wolf; D M Burger Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2007-08-17 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Luis F Lopez-Cortes; Rosa Ruiz-Valderas; Antonio Rivero; Angela Camacho; Manuel Marquez-Solero; Jesus Santos; Milagros García-Lazaro; Pompeyo Viciana; Jesus Rodriguez-Baños; Antonio Ocampo Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: A M Stek; B M Best; W Luo; E Capparelli; S Burchett; C Hu; H Li; J S Read; A Jennings; E Barr; E Smith; S S Rossi; M Mirochnick Journal: HIV Med Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Anna H Tran; Brookie M Best; Alice Stek; Jiajia Wang; Edmund V Capparelli; Sandra K Burchett; Regis Kreitchmann; Kittipong Rungruengthanakit; Kathleen George; Tim R Cressey; Nahida Chakhtoura; Elizabeth Smith; David E Shapiro; Mark Mirochnick Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Sarah K Himes; Yanling Huo; George K Siberry; Paige L Williams; Mabel L Rice; Patricia A Sirois; Toni Frederick; Rohan Hazra; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: George K Siberry; Denise L Jacobson; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Julia W Wu; Linda A DiMeglio; Ram Yogev; Katherine M Knapp; Justin J Wheeler; Laurie Butler; Rohan Hazra; Tracie L Miller; George R Seage; Russell B Van Dyke; Emily Barr; Mariam Davtyan; Lynne M Mofenson; Kenneth C Rich Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Daniel H Johnson; Charles Venuto; Marylyn D Ritchie; Gene D Morse; Eric S Daar; Paul J McLaren; David W Haas Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Ahizechukwu C Eke; Shelley A McCormack; Brookie M Best; Alice M Stek; Jiajia Wang; Regis Kreitchmann; David Shapiro; Elizabeth Smith; Lynne M Mofenson; Edmund V Capparelli; Mark Mirochnick Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Michelle S Cespedes; Delivette Castor; Susan L Ford; Doreen Lee; Yu Lou; Gary E Pakes; Judith A Aberg Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Ahizechukwu C Eke; Jiajia Wang; Khadija Amin; David E Shapiro; Alice Stek; Elizabeth Smith; Nahida Chakhtoura; Michael Basar; Kathleen George; Katherine M Knapp; Esaú C João; Kittipong Rungruengthanakit; Edmund Capparelli; Sandra Burchett; Mark Mirochnick; Brookie M Best Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 5.191