Literature DB >> 21283004

Qualitative analysis of an intensive care unit family satisfaction survey.

Natalie J Henrich1, Peter Dodek, Daren Heyland, Deborah Cook, Graeme Rocker, Demetrios Kutsogiannis, Craig Dale, Robert Fowler, Najib Ayas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the qualitative findings from a family satisfaction survey to identify and describe the themes that characterize family members' intensive care unit experiences.
DESIGN: As part of a larger mixed-methods study to determine the relationship between organizational culture and family satisfaction in critical care, family members of eligible patients in intensive care units completed a Family Satisfaction Survey (FS-ICU 24), which included three open-ended questions about strengths and weaknesses of the intensive care unit based on the family members' experiences and perspectives. Responses to these questions were coded and analyzed to identify key themes.
SETTING: Surveys were administered in 23 intensive care units from across Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Surveys were completed by family members of patients who were in the intensive care unit for >48 hrs and who had been visited by the family member at least once during their intensive care unit stay.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 1381 surveys were distributed and 880 responses were received. Intensive care unit experiences were found to be variable within and among intensive care units. Six themes emerged as central to respondents' satisfaction: quality of staff, overall quality of medical care, compassion and respect shown to the patient and family, communication with doctors, waiting room, and patient room. Within three themes, positive comments were more common than negative comments: quality of the staff (66% vs. 23%), overall quality of medical care provided (33% vs. 2%), and compassion and respect shown to the patient and family (29% vs. 12%). Within the other three themes, positive comments were less common than negative comments: communication with doctors (18% vs. 20%), waiting room (1% vs. 8%), and patient rooms (0.4% vs. 5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The study provided improved understanding of why family members are satisfied or dissatisfied with particular elements of the intensive care unit and this knowledge can be used to modify intensive care units to better meet the physical and emotional needs of the families of intensive care unit patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21283004     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820a92fb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  20 in total

1.  [Communication in intensive care medicine].

Authors:  G de Heer; S Kluge
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Provided information and parents' comprehension at the time of admission of their child in pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Agathe Béranger; Charlotte Pierron; Laure de Saint Blanquat; Naïm Bouazza; Sandrine Jean; Hélène Chappuy
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Schwarzkopf; Susanne Behrend; Helga Skupin; Isabella Westermann; Niels C Riedemann; Rüdiger Pfeifer; Albrecht Günther; Otto W Witte; Konrad Reinhart; Christiane S Hartog
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Recognizing, naming, and measuring a family intensive care unit syndrome.

Authors:  Giora Netzer; Donald R Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2014-03

5.  Effect of intensive care environment on family and patient satisfaction: a before-after study.

Authors:  Irene P Jongerden; Arjen J Slooter; Linda M Peelen; Hester Wessels; Colette M Ram; Jozef Kesecioglu; Margriet M Schneider; Diederik van Dijk
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Assessment of satisfaction with care among family members of survivors in a neuroscience intensive care unit.

Authors:  David Y Hwang; Daniel Yagoda; Hilary M Perrey; Tara M Tehan; Mary Guanci; Lillian Ananian; Paul F Currier; J Perren Cobb; Jonathan Rosand
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.230

7.  Family satisfaction in the ICU: why should ICU clinicians care?

Authors:  Anneliese M Schleyer; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Psychometric evaluation of a modified version of the family satisfaction in the ICU survey in parents/caregivers of critically ill children*.

Authors:  David Epstein; Jennifer B Unger; Beatriz Ornelas; Jennifer C Chang; Barry P Markovitz; David Y Moromisato; Peter M Dodek; Daren K Heyland; Jeffrey I Gold
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.624

9.  Can the UK 24-item family satisfaction in the intensive care unit questionnaire be used to evaluate quality improvement strategies aimed at improving family satisfaction with the ICU? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Susannah Lyes; Alvin Richards-Belle; Bronwen Connolly; Kathryn M Rowan; Lisa Hinton; Louise Locock
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2019-11-11

10.  Process of implementing collaborative care and its impacts on the provision of care and rehabilitation services to patients with a moderate or severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Lise R Talbot; Annie Lévesque; Josée Trottier
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2014-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.