Literature DB >> 21282725

Do low-shrink composites reduce polymerization shrinkage effects?

D Tantbirojn1, C S Pfeifer, R R Braga, A Versluis.   

Abstract

Progress in polymer science has led to continuous reduction of polymerization shrinkage, exemplified by a new generation of "low-shrink composites". The common inference that shrinkage stress effects will be reduced in teeth restored with such restoratives with lower shrinkage was tested in extracted human premolars. Mesio-occluso-distal slot-shaped cavities were cut and restored with a conventional (SupremePlus) or low-shrink (RefleXions, Premise, Kalore, and LS) composite (N = 5). We digitized the coronal surfaces before and 10 min after restoration to determine cuspal deflection from the buccal and lingual volume change/area. We also determined the main properties involved (total shrinkage, post-gel shrinkage, degree of conversion, and elastic modulus), as well as microleakage, to verify adequate bonding. It was shown that, due to shrinkage stresses, buccal and lingual surfaces pulled inward after restoration (9-14 microns). Only Kalore and LS resulted in significantly lower tooth deformation (ANOVA/Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc, p = 0.05). The other two low-shrink composites, despite having the lowest and highest total shrinkage values, did not cause significant differences in cuspal deflection. Deflection seemed most related to the combination of post-gel shrinkage and elastic modulus. Therefore, even for significantly lower total shrinkage values, shrinkage stress is not necessarily reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21282725     DOI: 10.1177/0022034510396217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of laser- and bur-prepared class I cavities restored with two different low-shrinkage composite resins: a randomized, controlled 60-month clinical trial.

Authors:  O Z Fatma Dilsad; Esra Ergin; Nuray Attar; Sevil Gurgan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Post-gel shrinkage, elastic modulus, and stress generated by orthodontic adhesives.

Authors:  Michael J Rasmussen; Cameron Togrye; Terry M Trojan; Daranee Tantbirojn; Antheunis Versluis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 3.  Dimethacrylate network formation and polymer property evolution as determined by the selection of monomers and curing conditions.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Stansbury
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Polymerization stress evolution of a bulk-fill flowable composite under different compliances.

Authors:  Yongwen Guo; Forrest A Landis; Zhengzhi Wang; Ding Bai; Li Jiang; Martin Y M Chiang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 5.  Low-Shrinkage Resin Matrices in Restorative Dentistry-Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ebtehal G Albeshir; Rashed Alsahafi; Reem Albluwi; Abdulrahman A Balhaddad; Heba Mitwalli; Thomas W Oates; Gary D Hack; Jirun Sun; Michael D Weir; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.748

6.  Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.

Authors:  Bruno Baracco; M Victoria Fuentes; Laura Ceballos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  Polymer-Based Direct Filling Materials.

Authors:  Carmem S Pfeifer
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2017-10

8.  Evaluation of cervical marginal and internal adaptation using newer bulk fill composites: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Rolly Shrivastav Agarwal; Hemlatha Hiremath; Jatin Agarwal; Ashish Garg
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

9.  Clinical performance of class I cavities restored with bulk fill composite at a 1-year follow-up using the FDI criteria: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Chinni Suneelkumar; Puttaganti Harshala; Koppolu Madhusudhana; Anumula Lavanya; Anirudhan Subha; Sannapureddy Swapna
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2021-04-16

10.  Mechanical properties of composites as functions of the syringe storage temperature and energy dose.

Authors:  Fernanda Oliveira Chaves; Natália Coelho de Farias; Luciano Marcelo de Mello Medeiros; Roberta Caroline Bruschi Alonso; Vinicius Di Hipólito; Paulo Henrique Perlatti D'Alpino
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.