Alexandria Chu1, Nan Jiang, Stanton A Glantz. 1. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, 530 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143-1390, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand how British American Tobacco (BAT) and Philip Morris (PM) researched the role and popularity of cigarette gifting in forming relationships among Chinese customs and how they exploited the practice to promote their brands State Express 555 and Marlboro. METHODS: Searches and analysis of industry documents from the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library complemented by searches on LexisNexis Academic news, online search engines and information from the tobacco industry trade press. RESULTS: From 1980-1999, BAT and PM employed Chinese market research firms to gather consumer information about perceptions of foreign cigarettes and the companies discovered that cigarettes, especially prestigious ones, were gifted and smoked purposely for building relationships and social status in China. BAT and PM promoted their brands as gifts by enhancing cigarette cartons and promoting culturally themed packages, particularly during the gifting festivals of Chinese New Year and Mid-Autumn Festival to tie their brands in to festival values such as warmth, friendship and celebration. They used similar marketing in Chinese communities outside China. CONCLUSIONS: BAT and PM tied their brands to Chinese cigarette gifting customs by appealing to social and cultural values of respect and personal honour. Decoupling cigarettes from their social significance in China and removing their appeal would probably reduce cigarette gifting and promote a decline in smoking. Tobacco control efforts in countermarketing, large graphic warnings and plain packaging to make cigarette packages less attractive as gifts could contribute to denormalising cigarette gifting.
OBJECTIVE: To understand how British American Tobacco (BAT) and Philip Morris (PM) researched the role and popularity of cigarette gifting in forming relationships among Chinese customs and how they exploited the practice to promote their brands State Express 555 and Marlboro. METHODS: Searches and analysis of industry documents from the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library complemented by searches on LexisNexis Academic news, online search engines and information from the tobacco industry trade press. RESULTS: From 1980-1999, BAT and PM employed Chinese market research firms to gather consumer information about perceptions of foreign cigarettes and the companies discovered that cigarettes, especially prestigious ones, were gifted and smoked purposely for building relationships and social status in China. BAT and PM promoted their brands as gifts by enhancing cigarette cartons and promoting culturally themed packages, particularly during the gifting festivals of Chinese New Year and Mid-Autumn Festival to tie their brands in to festival values such as warmth, friendship and celebration. They used similar marketing in Chinese communities outside China. CONCLUSIONS: BAT and PM tied their brands to Chinese cigarette gifting customs by appealing to social and cultural values of respect and personal honour. Decoupling cigarettes from their social significance in China and removing their appeal would probably reduce cigarette gifting and promote a decline in smoking. Tobacco control efforts in countermarketing, large graphic warnings and plain packaging to make cigarette packages less attractive as gifts could contribute to denormalising cigarette gifting.
Authors: Marion Ceraso; Jane A McElroy; Xiaodong Kuang; Peter M Vila; Xueping Du; Long Lu; Hongkun Ren; Ning Qian; Douglas E Jorenby; Michael C Fiore Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Steve Shaowei Xu; Shannon Gravely; Gang Meng; Tara Elton-Marshall; Richard J O'Connor; Anne C K Quah; Guoze Feng; Yuan Jiang; Grace J Hu; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Tob Control Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Li-Ling Huang; James F Thrasher; Yuan Jiang; Qiang Li; Geoffrey T Fong; Yvette Chang; Katrina M Walsemann; Daniela B Friedman Journal: Tob Control Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Abu S Abdullah; Zhenyu Ma; Jing Liao; Kaiyong Huang; Li Yang; Zhiyong Zhang; Jonathan P Winickoff; Guang-Min Nong Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Li-Ling Huang; James F Thrasher; Yuan Jiang; Qiang Li; Geoffrey T Fong; Anne C K Quah Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-11-17 Impact factor: 3.295