Literature DB >> 21282132

Attitudes to perinatal postmortem: parental views about research participation.

Andrew C G Breeze1, Helen Statham, Gerald A Hackett, Flora A Jessop, Christoph C Lees.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study parental attitudes to participating in questionnaire research about perinatal postmortem immediately after late miscarriage, stillbirth and termination for fetal abnormality.
DESIGN: Prospective self-completion questionnaire.
SETTING: UK fetal medicine and delivery unit. PATIENTS: 35 women and their partners after second or third trimester pregnancy loss, making decisions about having a postmortem.
METHODS: Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire about postmortem decision-making which included questions about their attitudes to taking part in research. Prior to giving full approval for the study, the Research Ethics Committee (REC) requested feedback after 10 questionnaires had been returned.
RESULTS: Responses from the first 10 participants were positive about the research and the REC allowed the study to continue. 31 questionnaires were received from parents of 17 babies (49% of those asked; 16 from mothers, 15 from fathers). Of the 22 participants who answered a question about the impact of participating in this research, 73% stated that completing the questionnaire had helped them feel better about the decision whether or not to consent to postmortem and none reported any adverse effect of completing the questionnaire. Additional comments made by 19 participants supported this finding.
CONCLUSION: Research into this sensitive area of perinatal medicine where there is a poor outcome is possible and is indeed well received by many parents. RECs should not automatically take a negative stance towards studies of this type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21282132     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.038505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  6 in total

1.  Decision influences and aftermath: parents, stillbirth and autopsy.

Authors:  Dell Horey; Vicki Flenady; Liz Conway; Emma McLeod; Teck Yee Khong
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Factors affecting uptake of postmortem examination in the prenatal, perinatal and paediatric setting.

Authors:  C Lewis; M Hill; O J Arthurs; C Hutchinson; L S Chitty; N J Sebire
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Life after the loss: protocol for a Danish longitudinal follow-up study unfolding life and grief after the death of a child during pregnancy from gestational week 14, during birth or in the first 4 weeks of life.

Authors:  Dorte Hvidtjørn; Christina Prinds; Mette Bliddal; Tine Brink Henriksen; Joanne Cacciatore; Maja O'Connor
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The Midland and North of England Stillbirth Study (MiNESS).

Authors:  Jayne Platts; Edwin A Mitchell; Tomasina Stacey; Bill L Martin; Devender Roberts; Lesley McCowan; Alexander E P Heazell
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Women's experiences of being invited to participate in a case-control study of stillbirth - findings from the Midlands and North of England Stillbirth Study.

Authors:  Jayne Budd; Tomasina Stacey; Bill Martin; Devender Roberts; Alexander E P Heazell
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Investigating the benefits and challenges of including bereaved women in research: a multifaceted perinatal audit in a socially disadvantaged French district.

Authors:  Priscille Sauvegrain; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.