Literature DB >> 21282030

Shared Decision Making Guidance Reminders in Practice (SDM-GRIP).

Margaret Holmes-Rovner1, Karen Kelly-Blake, Francesca Dwamena, Katherine Dontje, Rebecca C Henry, Adesuwa Olomu, David R Rovner, Marilyn L Rothert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Develop a system of practice tools and procedures to prompt shared decision making in primary care. SDM-GRIP (Shared Decision Making Guidance Reminders in Practice) was developed for suspected stable coronary artery disease (CAD), prior to the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decision.
METHODS: Program evaluation of SDM-GRIP components: Grand Rounds, provider training (communication skills and clinical evidence), decision aid (DA), patient group visit, encounter decision guide (EDG), SDM provider visit.
RESULTS: Participation-Physician training=73% (21/29); patient group visits=25% of patients with diagnosis of CAD contacted (43/168). SDM visits=16% (27/168). Among SDM visit pairs, 82% of responding providers reported using the EDG in SDM encounters. Patients valued the SDM-GRIP program, and wanted to discuss comparative effectiveness information with a cardiologist. SDM visits were routinely reimbursed.
CONCLUSION: Program elements were well received and logistically feasible. However, recruitment to an extra educational group visit was low. Future implementation will move SDM-GRIP to the point of routine ordering of non-emergent stress tests to retain pre-decision timing of PCI and to improve coordination of care, with SDM tools available across primary care and cardiology. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Guidance prompts and provider training appear feasible. Implementation at stress testing requires further investigation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21282030     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  10 in total

1.  Barriers and facilitators to routine distribution of patient decision support interventions: a preliminary study in community-based primary care settings.

Authors:  Visith Uy; Suepattra G May; Caroline Tietbohl; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Gain-loss framing and patients' decisions: a linguistic examination of information framing in physician-patient conversations.

Authors:  Ilona Fridman; Angela Fagerlin; Karen A Scherr; Laura D Scherer; Hanna Huffstetler; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2020-07-28

3.  Is Better Patient Knowledge Associated with Different Treatment Preferences? A Survey of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Neal Yuan; Christy Boscardin; Nadra E Lisha; R Adams Dudley; Grace A Lin
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Implementing shared decision making in federally qualified health centers, a quasi-experimental design study: the Office-Guidelines Applied to Practice (Office-GAP) program.

Authors:  Adesuwa Olomu; William Hart-Davidson; Zhehui Luo; Karen Kelly-Blake; Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  Organizational- and system-level characteristics that influence implementation of shared decision-making and strategies to address them - a scoping review.

Authors:  Isabelle Scholl; Allison LaRussa; Pola Hahlweg; Sarah Kobrin; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  A principal components analysis of factors associated with successful implementation of an LVAD decision support tool.

Authors:  Kristin M Kostick; Meredith Trejo; Arvind Bhimaraj; Andrew Civitello; Jonathan Grinstein; Douglas Horstmanshof; Ulrich P Jorde; Matthias Loebe; Mandeep R Mehra; Nasir Z Sulemanjee; Vinay Thohan; Barry H Trachtenberg; Nir Uriel; Robert J Volk; Jerry D Estep; J S Blumenthal-Barby
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Factors influencing implementation of an insulin patient decision aid at public health clinics in Malaysia: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Wen Ting Tong; Yew Kong Lee; Chirk Jenn Ng; Ping Yein Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Refining a brief decision aid in stable CAD: cognitive interviews.

Authors:  Karen Kelly-Blake; Stacie Clark; Katherine Dontje; Adesuwa Olomu; Rebecca C Henry; David R Rovner; Marilyn L Rothert; Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 9.  "Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Isabelle Scholl; Caroline Tietbohl; Mala Mann; Adrian G K Edwards; Catharine Clay; France Légaré; Trudy van der Weijden; Carmen L Lewis; Richard M Wexler; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  The Office Guidelines Applied to Practice program improves secondary prevention of heart disease in Federally Qualified Healthcare Centers.

Authors:  Adesuwa Olomu; Nazia Naz Khan; David Todem; Qinhua Huang; Esha Kumar; Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-06-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.