Literature DB >> 21281273

Informative cluster sizes for subcluster-level covariates and weighted generalized estimating equations.

Ying Huang1, Brian Leroux.   

Abstract

Williamson, Datta, and Satten's (2003, Biometrics 59, 36-42) cluster-weighted generalized estimating equations (CWGEEs) are effective in adjusting for bias due to informative cluster sizes for cluster-level covariates. We show that CWGEE may not perform well, however, for covariates that can take different values within a cluster if the numbers of observations at each covariate level are informative. On the other hand, inverse probability of treatment weighting accounts for informative treatment propensity but not for informative cluster size. Motivated by evaluating the effect of a binary exposure in presence of such types of informativeness, we propose several weighted GEE estimators, with weights related to the size of a cluster as well as the distribution of the binary exposure within the cluster. Choice of the weights depends on the population of interest and the nature of the exposure. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate the superior performance of the new estimators compared to existing estimators such as from GEE, CWGEE, and inverse probability of treatment-weighted GEE. We demonstrate the use of our method using an example examining covariate effects on the risk of dental caries among small children.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21281273      PMCID: PMC3137732          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01542.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  5 in total

1.  Between-subject and within-subject statistical information in dental research.

Authors:  L A Mancl; B G Leroux; T A DeRouen
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology.

Authors:  J M Robins; M A Hernán; B Brumback
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Analysis of clustered binary outcomes using within-cluster paired resampling.

Authors:  Randall H Rieger; Clarice R Weinberg
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Marginal analyses of clustered data when cluster size is informative.

Authors:  John M Williamson; Somnath Datta; Glen A Satten
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Between- and within-cluster covariate effects in the analysis of clustered data.

Authors:  J M Neuhaus; J D Kalbfleisch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.571

  5 in total
  17 in total

1.  Methodological approaches to analyzing IVF data with multiple cycles.

Authors:  Jennifer Yland; Carmen Messerlian; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Jennifer B Ford; Russ Hauser; Paige L Williams
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Inferring marginal association with paired and unpaired clustered data.

Authors:  Douglas J Lorenz; Steven Levy; Somnath Datta
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Pattern-mixture models with incomplete informative cluster size: Application to a repeated pregnancy study.

Authors:  Ashok Chaurasia; Danping Liu; Paul S Albert
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 1.864

4.  Statistical lessons learned for designing cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trials from the NIH Health Care Systems Collaboratory Biostatistics and Design Core.

Authors:  Andrea J Cook; Elizabeth Delong; David M Murray; William M Vollmer; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Cluster adjusted regression for displaced subject data (CARDS): Marginal inference under potentially informative temporal cluster size profiles.

Authors:  Joe Bible; James D Beck; Somnath Datta
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Tests for informative cluster size using a novel balanced bootstrap scheme.

Authors:  Jaakko Nevalainen; Hannu Oja; Somnath Datta
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Non-parametric regression in clustered multistate current status data with informative cluster size.

Authors:  Ling Lan; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay; Somnath Datta
Journal:  Stat Neerl       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 1.190

8.  A rank-sum test for clustered data when the number of subjects in a group within a cluster is informative.

Authors:  Sandipan Dutta; Somnath Datta
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Accounting for interactions and complex inter-subject dependency in estimating treatment effect in cluster-randomized trials with missing outcomes.

Authors:  Melanie Prague; Rui Wang; Alisa Stephens; Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen; Victor DeGruttola
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Effect of oocyte donor stimulation on recipient outcomes: data from a US national donor oocyte bank.

Authors:  H S Hipp; A J Gaskins; Z P Nagy; S M Capelouto; D B Shapiro; J B Spencer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.