Literature DB >> 21280405

Biodiversity and sectoral responsibility in the development of Swedish Forestry Policy, 1988-1993.

Terrence Bush1.   

Abstract

In 1993 the Swedish parliament deregulated national forestry policy and established an environmental goal in parallel with the previous, long-standing goal of high wood production. This paper shows how the change occurred in the context of major changes in Swedish environmental policy during the late 1980s and early 1990s. Within a short time, new environmental legislation and the introduction of legal protection for small forest and agricultural habitats of high ecological value reoriented national forestry policy, away from an overriding focus on wood production to an increased awareness of nature conservation and biodiversity preservation. Reflecting a major compromise with the state, forest owners have gained greater freedom to manage their land, but must also improve environmental conditions while achieving high wood production, a policy known as 'freedom under responsibility'. The paper explains how both the parliament and industry supported increased nature conservation and biodiversity to maintain forest health and support the forestry industry, by favouring responsible resource use and not simply protection from human influence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21280405     DOI: 10.1080/03468755.2010.528249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Hist        ISSN: 0346-8755


  4 in total

1.  Sustained yield forestry in Sweden and Russia: how does it correspond to sustainable forest management policy?

Authors:  Marine Elbakidze; Kjell Andersson; Per Angelstam; Glen W Armstrong; Robert Axelsson; Frederik Doyon; Martin Hermansson; Jonas Jacobsson; Yurij Pautov
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Evidence-based knowledge versus negotiated indicators for assessment of ecological sustainability: the Swedish Forest Stewardship Council standard as a case study.

Authors:  Per Angelstam; Jean-Michel Roberge; Robert Axelsson; Marine Elbakidze; Karl-Olof Bergman; Anders Dahlberg; Erik Degerman; Sönke Eggers; Per-Anders Esseen; Joakim Hjältén; Therese Johansson; Jörg Müller; Heidi Paltto; Tord Snäll; Ihor Soloviy; Johan Törnblom
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  General Public Acceptance of Forest Risk Management Strategies in Sweden: Comparing Three Approaches to Acceptability.

Authors:  Louise Eriksson; Christer Björkman; Maartje J Klapwijk
Journal:  Environ Behav       Date:  2017-02-10

4.  The Knowledge and Value Basis of Private Forest Management in Sweden: Actual Knowledge, Confidence, and Value Priorities.

Authors:  Louise Eriksson; Clas Fries
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.266

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.