Literature DB >> 21279970

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 140 consecutive hips with a minimum five year follow-up. A clinical, radiological and histological analysis.

Sandro Giannini1, Matteo Cadossi, Eugenio Chiarello, Cesare Faldini, Antonio Moroni, Matteo Romagnoli.   

Abstract

We reviewed the clinical and radiological outcome at a minimum of five years of 140 consecutive metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (HR) arthroplasties in 132 patients. The mean follow-up was 73 months (62 to 105). Revision of either component was defined as failure. The average Harris hip score (HHS) was 58.6 (25 to 88) preoperatively and 94.4 (60 to 100) at the latest follow-up (p<0.0005). Average University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score was 3.1 (1 to 9) pre-operatively and 6.7 (2 to 10) post-operatively (p<0.0005). The survival after 6 years was 97.8% overall and 98.5% (excluding a post traumatic femoral neck fracture). These good medium-term results suggest that HR is an effective procedure in young and active patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21279970     DOI: 10.5301/hip.2011.6281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  8 in total

1.  Profunda femoris pseudoaneurysm following Birmingham hip resurfacing: an important differential diagnosis for a periarticular cystic mass.

Authors:  M S Thomas; J N O'Hara; A M Davies; Steven L J James
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of post-operative complications following hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Douis; D J Dunlop; A M Pearson; J N O'Hara; S L J James
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Hip resurfacing: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Régis Pailhé; Akash Sharma; Nicolas Reina; Etienne Cavaignac; Philippe Chiron; Jean-Michel Laffosse
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates.

Authors:  S Sehatzadeh; K Kaulback; L Levin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-08-01

5.  The Correlation of Serum Metal Ions with Functional Outcome Scores at Three-to-Six Years following Large Head Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sheethal Prasad Patange Subbarao; Ibrahim A Malek; Khitish Mohanty; Phillip Thomas; Alun John
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2013-03-27

6.  Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty Associated with Adverse Local Tissue Reaction and Pseudoaneurysm of the Superior Gluteal Artery: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Amit Shah; Rajesh Botchu; David Dunlop; A Mark Davies; Steven L James
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2016-10-31

7.  Histological, histomorphometric and microtomographic analyses of retrieval hip resurfacing arthroplasty failed at different times.

Authors:  Francesca Salamanna; Milena Fini; Annapaola Parrilli; Matteo Cadossi; Nicolò Nicoli Aldini; Gianluca Giavaresi; Deianira Luciani; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements--The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Olli Lainiala; Petra Elo; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.