Literature DB >> 21279797

Fertility planning status: united states, 1965.

N B Ryder1, C F Westoff.   

Abstract

Data concerning the planning circumstances of the interval preceding each pregnancy, collected from a national sample of 4810 married women, are used to establish the fertility planning status of each respondent as one of five classes: (1) never-pregnant; (2) number failure; (3) at least one timing failure; (4) at least one timing success; (5) neither success nor failure. For the ever-pregnant women who intended no more children, 32 percent of the exposed were number failures and 62 percent of the rest were timing failures. For the ever-pregnant women who intended more children, 67 percent of the exposed were timing failures. Women not exposed to the risk of timing failure because they claimed to want all of their pregnancies as soon as possible had similar characteristics to women reporting failures; accordingly the reliability of their reports is suspect. The probabilities of failure are well-patterned by race, religion and education: higher for Blacks than for Whites; within the latter, higher for Catholics than for Non-Catholics; and inversely related to education, except among White Catholics. Although uniformly high, the proportions classified as failures are probably under-estimates of the true values for completed families, because of misreporting and continuing exposure to risk, subsequent to interview.

Entities:  

Year:  1969        PMID: 21279797     DOI: 10.2307/2060088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Demography        ISSN: 0070-3370


  3 in total

1.  A critique of the national fertility study.

Authors:  N B Ryder
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1973-11

Review 2.  If all we knew about women was what we read in Demography, what would we know?

Authors:  S C Watkins
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1993-11

3.  Children born after unplanned pregnancies and cognitive development at 3 years: social differentials in the United Kingdom Millennium Cohort.

Authors:  Elise de La Rochebrochard; Heather Joshi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.897

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.