Literature DB >> 21279398

Analysis of outcome of Lichtenstein groin hernia repair by surgeons-in-training versus a specialized surgeon.

A Frisén1, J Starck, S Smeds, P O Nyström, A Kald.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Groin hernia repair is a common procedure in general surgery, and is taught to and performed by surgeons early in their training. The aim of this observational study was to compare hernia repair performance and results of surgical trainees with those of a specialized surgeon, to identify what factors may influence short and long-term outcome, and areas for improvement in surgical training.
METHODS: A non-randomized parallel cohort study was designed; 200 Lichtenstein repairs in adult males were included, of which 96 were performed by surgical trainees. Patient characteristics, surgical experience, and operative data, including duration of procedural parts and surgical complexity, were noted at surgery. Postoperative complications, recurrence, chronic pain and residual symptoms were assessed at long-term follow-up after a median of 34.5 months.
RESULTS: Surgical trainees required longer overall operative time, with a disproportionally longer time for mobilizing the sac and cord. They perceived exposure and mobilization as more difficult than the specialist, and also a greater demand on their own experience during surgery. The trainee repairs had a higher rate of postoperative complications (14.7% vs 5.0%) but recurrence rate was the same as for specialist repairs. At long-term follow-up, specialist repairs had higher symptom burden and more chronic pain.
CONCLUSIONS: It was more efficient, but not necessarily better, to let a specialized surgeon perform the repairs. It seems likely that targeted training in dissection and mobilization could decrease level of perceived complexity and shorten the operative time required by surgical trainees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21279398     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-010-0780-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  10 in total

1.  [Not to hurt the patient--do we live up to this in hernia surgery? A self-assessment method tested to answer the question].

Authors:  Staffan Smeds; Lars Löfström; Anders Kald
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  2008 May 21-27

2.  Influence of nerve identification and the resection of nerves 'at risk' on postoperative pain in open inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  S Smeds; L Löfström; O Eriksson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Risk factors for long-term pain after hernia surgery.

Authors:  Ulf Fränneby; Gabriel Sandblom; Pär Nordin; Olof Nyrén; Ulf Gunnarsson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Reoperation as surrogate endpoint in hernia surgery. A three year follow-up of 1565 herniorrhaphies.

Authors:  A Kald; E Nilsson; B Anderberg; M Bragmark; P Engström; U Gunnarsson; S Haapaniemi; J Lindhagen; P Nilsson; G Sandblom; A Stubberöd
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1998-01

5.  Open "tension-free" repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique.

Authors:  P K Amid; A G Shulman; I L Lichtenstein
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1996-06

6.  Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a longitudinal self-assessment study.

Authors:  S Smeds; A Kald; L Löfström
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach for inguinal hernia: the favorable learning curve for trainees.

Authors:  Jaime Haidenberg; Michael L Kendrick; Tobias Meile; David R Farley
Journal:  Curr Surg       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

8.  Validation of an Inguinal Pain Questionnaire for assessment of chronic pain after groin hernia repair.

Authors:  U Fränneby; U Gunnarsson; M Andersson; R Heuman; P Nordin; O Nyrén; G Sandblom
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Current status of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Denmark.

Authors:  J Rosenberg; M Bay-Nielsen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  A prospective trial of primary inguinal hernia repair by surgical trainees.

Authors:  B W Miedema; S M Ibrahim; B D Davis; D G Koivunen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 4.739

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Analysis of outcome of Lichtenstein groin hernia repair by surgeons-in-training versus a specialized surgeon.

Authors:  F Feroci; E Lenzi; M Baraghini; M Scatizzi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Impact of Residency Training Level on the Surgical Quality Following General Surgery Procedures.

Authors:  Dominik Loiero; Maja Slankamenac; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Ksenija Slankamenac
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Uniformity of Chronic Pain Assessment after Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Critical Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Marijke Molegraaf; Johan Lange; Arthur Wijsmuller
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 1.745

4.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Comparison of Coskun and Lichteinstein hernia repair methods for groin hernia.

Authors:  Tolga Dinç; Hayri Mükerrem Cete; Barış Saylam; Mehmet Vasfi Özer; Arife Polat Düzgün; Faruk Coşkun
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 1.859

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.