Literature DB >> 21279337

Combination therapy with diltiazem plus CsA/MMF/Pred or CsA/Aza/Pred triple immunosuppressive regimens for use in clinical kidney transplantation in Northwestern China.

Yong Song1, Wujun Xue, Puxun Tian, Xiaoming Ding, Xiaoming Pan, Hang Yan, Jun Hou, Xinshun Feng, Heli Xiang, Xiaohui Tian, Gaoping Qin, Xiaohu Fan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The effects of diltiazem on 1692 kidney transplant recipients under the immunosuppressive regimen of cyclosporine A (CsA) in combination with either mycophenolate mofetil or azothioprine were assessed. The two treatment groups were compared for blood concentrations of CsA, the extent of acceptable dosage reduction for the maintenance of immunotherapy, potential effects of kidney protection, and promotion of graft function.
METHOD: We monitored changes of blood concentrations of CsA in the two different patient treatment groups for post-transplant graft function, episodes of acute rejection, and hepatic and renal toxicity in 1640 renal transplant recipients after treatment with diltiazem.
RESULTS: In patients treated with the triple immunosuppressive regimen consisting of CsA, azothioprine, and prednisolone (Pred), the sub-group of patients receiving the diltiazem treatment saw a significantly reduced CsA dosage in comparison to the non-diltiazem group (control group 1) (P < 0.05), but the blood concentrations of CsA of the diltiazem group were higher than those of control group 1 (P < 0.01). Of the patients treated with CsA, mycophenolate mofetil, and Pred, the sub-group of patients also treated with diltiazem showed similar effects: CsA dosage was reduced (P < 0.01) and the blood concentrations of CsA significantly increased (P < 0.01) in comparison with those of control group 2. In addition, recovery time of graft function decreased to 4.7 ± 1.8 days and 3.9 ± 1.4 days in the two diltiazem treatment groups, respectively (P < 0.05), and the rate of acute rejection decreased to 21 (p < 0.05) and 7.9% (P < 0.01), respectively.
CONCLUSION: In our cohort of renal transplantation patients, co-administration of CsA and diltiazem increased CsA blood concentration, thereby resulting in a reduction in its required dosage treatment, which lightened the patients' economic burden while improving primary and long-term kidney function by promoting the recovery of graft function and decreasing hepatic and renal toxicity. The co-administration of diltiazem may also reduce the rate of acute rejection, especially in patients who also receive the triple immunosuppressive regimen consisting of CsA, mycophenolate mofetil, and Pred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21279337     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-011-0991-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  33 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs in clinical practice.

Authors:  Barry D Kahan; Paul Keown; Gary A Levy; Atholl Johnston
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.393

2.  Diltiazem co-administration reduces cyclosporine toxicity after heart transplantation: a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  P Macdonald; A Keogh; J Connell; A Harvison; D Richens; P Spratt
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  A prospective study of the effect of diltiazem in renal allograft recipients receiving cyclosporine A: preliminary results.

Authors:  J J Kelly; R G Walker; A J d'Apice; P Kincaid-Smith
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Co-administration of diltiazem and cyclosporine for kidney transplant recipients: a four year follow-up study.

Authors:  Atiporn Ingsathit; Vasant Sumethkul; Panas Chalermsanyakorn; Sophon Jirasiritham
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2006-08

5.  Influence of diltiazem on cyclosporin clearance.

Authors:  J M Griño; I Sabate; A M Castelao; J Alsina
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Correlation Between C2 and AUC(0-4) in Renal Transplant Patients Treated With Diltiazem.

Authors:  C A Aros; H O Schneider; C A Flores; L G Ardiles; P A Alruiz; V Jerez; S A Mezzano
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  Associations between use of cyclosporine-sparing agents and outcome in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Stephen P McDonald; Graeme R Russ
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Adequate early cyclosporin exposure is critical to prevent renal allograft rejection: patients monitored by absorption profiling.

Authors:  C M Clase; K Mahalati; B A Kiberd; J G Lawen; K A West; A D Fraser; P Belitsky
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Cost containment: coadministration of diltiazem with cyclosporine after heart transplantation.

Authors:  H Valantine; A Keogh; N McIntosh; S Hunt; P Oyer; J Schroeder
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Effect of genetic polymorphisms of CYP3A5 and MDR1 on cyclosporine concentration during the early stage after renal transplantation in Chinese patients co-treated with diltiazem.

Authors:  Yixi Wang; Changxi Wang; Jiali Li; Xueding Wang; Genglong Zhu; Xiao Chen; Huichang Bi; Min Huang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.