PURPOSE: A quantitative measure of the airway pressure-time tracing during passive inflation [stress index (SI)] has been suggested as an indicator of tidal lung recruitment and/or overinflation. If reliable, this simple index could help guide positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and tidal volume selection. The compartment surrounding the lungs should impact airway pressure and could, therefore, affect SI validity. To explore the possibility, we determined SI in a swine model of pleural effusion (PLEF). METHODS: Unilateral PLEF was simulated by instilling fluid (13 ml/kg-moderate, 26 ml/kg-large) into the right pleural space of five anesthetized, paralyzed, mechanically ventilated pigs. Animals were ventilated with constant flow ventilation: tidal volume (V (T)) 9 ml/kg, f set to end-tidal CO₂ (ETCO₂) of 30-40 mmHg, inspiratory to expiratory ratio (I/E) 1:2, PEEP 1 or 10 cmH₂O. Respiratory system mechanics and computed tomography (CT) were acquired at end-inspiration and end-expiration to determine % tidal recruitment and overinflation. RESULTS: Prior to PLEF instillation, SI values derived at PEEP = 1 and 10 cmH₂O were 0.90 and 1.22, respectively. Moderate PLEF increased these SI values to 1.06 and 1.24 and large PLEF further increased SI to 1.23 and 1.27 despite extensive tidal recruitment and negligible overdistention by CT. The initial half of the tidal pressure curve produced SI values (range 0.82-1.17) that were significantly lower than those of the second half (0.98-1.37). CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of pleural fluid, SI indicated overinflation when virtually none was present and tidal lung recruitment predominated. When the extrapulmonary environment is abnormal, caregivers are advised to interpret the SI with caution.
PURPOSE: A quantitative measure of the airway pressure-time tracing during passive inflation [stress index (SI)] has been suggested as an indicator of tidal lung recruitment and/or overinflation. If reliable, this simple index could help guide positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and tidal volume selection. The compartment surrounding the lungs should impact airway pressure and could, therefore, affect SI validity. To explore the possibility, we determined SI in a swine model of pleural effusion (PLEF). METHODS: Unilateral PLEF was simulated by instilling fluid (13 ml/kg-moderate, 26 ml/kg-large) into the right pleural space of five anesthetized, paralyzed, mechanically ventilated pigs. Animals were ventilated with constant flow ventilation: tidal volume (V (T)) 9 ml/kg, f set to end-tidal CO₂ (ETCO₂) of 30-40 mmHg, inspiratory to expiratory ratio (I/E) 1:2, PEEP 1 or 10 cmH₂O. Respiratory system mechanics and computed tomography (CT) were acquired at end-inspiration and end-expiration to determine % tidal recruitment and overinflation. RESULTS: Prior to PLEF instillation, SI values derived at PEEP = 1 and 10 cmH₂O were 0.90 and 1.22, respectively. Moderate PLEF increased these SI values to 1.06 and 1.24 and large PLEF further increased SI to 1.23 and 1.27 despite extensive tidal recruitment and negligible overdistention by CT. The initial half of the tidal pressure curve produced SI values (range 0.82-1.17) that were significantly lower than those of the second half (0.98-1.37). CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of pleural fluid, SI indicated overinflation when virtually none was present and tidal lung recruitment predominated. When the extrapulmonary environment is abnormal, caregivers are advised to interpret the SI with caution.
Authors: Salvatore Grasso; Pierpaolo Terragni; Luciana Mascia; Vito Fanelli; Michel Quintel; Peter Herrmann; Goran Hedenstierna; Arthur S Slutsky; V Marco Ranieri Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Jerónimo Graf; Spyros D Mentzelopoulos; Alexander B Adams; Jie Zhang; Joseph H Tashjian; John J Marini Journal: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: V M Ranieri; H Zhang; L Mascia; M Aubin; C Y Lin; J B Mullen; S Grasso; M Binnie; G A Volgyesi; P Eng; A S Slutsky Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Alysson R Carvalho; Peter M Spieth; Paolo Pelosi; Marcos F Vidal Melo; Thea Koch; Frederico C Jandre; Antonio Giannella-Neto; Marcelo Gama de Abreu Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Laurent Brochard; Greg S Martin; Lluis Blanch; Paolo Pelosi; F Javier Belda; Amal Jubran; Luciano Gattinoni; Jordi Mancebo; V Marco Ranieri; Jean-Christophe M Richard; Diederik Gommers; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Antonio Pesenti; Samir Jaber; Ola Stenqvist; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Crit Care Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; J Randall Curtis; Daniel De Backer; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Patricia Rocco; Jean-François Timsit; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Vittoria Vecchi; Thomas Langer; Massimo Bellomi; Cristiano Rampinelli; Kevin K Chung; Leopoldo C Cancio; Luciano Gattinoni; Andriy I Batchinsky Journal: Crit Care Date: 2013-08-31 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Carlos Ferrando; Fernando Suárez-Sipmann; Andrea Gutierrez; Gerardo Tusman; Jose Carbonell; Marisa García; Laura Piqueras; Desamparados Compañ; Susanie Flores; Marina Soro; Alicia Llombart; Francisco Javier Belda Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Chun Pan; Lu Chen; Yun-Hang Zhang; Wei Liu; Rosario Urbino; V Marco Ranieri; Hai-Bo Qiu; Yi Yang Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 2.628