| Literature DB >> 21279235 |
Michael H Ramsey1, Bastiaan Geelhoed, Roger Wood, Andrew P Damant.
Abstract
A realistic estimate of the uncertainty of a measurement result is essential for its reliable interpretation. Recent methods for such estimation include the contribution to uncertainty from the sampling process, but they only include the random and not the systematic effects. Sampling Proficiency Tests (SPTs) have been used previously to assess the performance of samplers, but the results can also be used to evaluate measurement uncertainty, including the systematic effects. A new SPT conducted on the determination of moisture in fresh butter is used to exemplify how SPT results can be used not only to score samplers but also to estimate uncertainty. The comparison between uncertainty evaluated within- and between-samplers is used to demonstrate that sampling bias is causing the estimates of expanded relative uncertainty to rise by over a factor of two (from 0.39% to 0.87%) in this case. General criteria are given for the experimental design and the sampling target that are required to apply this approach to measurements on any material. © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21279235 DOI: 10.1039/c0an00705f
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Analyst ISSN: 0003-2654 Impact factor: 4.616