Literature DB >> 21279120

Electronic fetal monitoring in a small hospital. Part 1: antepartum use.

R I Casson.   

Abstract

A case series analysis was performed at a 40-bed hospital in Newfoundland to assess the antepartum use of an electronic fetal heart rate monitor; 339 nonstress tests were performed on 98 patients. One stillbirth occurred 12 days after a reactive nonstress test. One patient had persistently nonreactive tests and underwent cesarean section; the infant was distressed at birth. Antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring may provide a useful measure in prenatal risk assessment in small hospitals for patients at risk of perinatal morbidity or mortality. Potential benefits for those at no predictable risk need to be investigated further.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 21279120      PMCID: PMC2154331     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  32 in total

1.  Prenatal and intrapartum high-risk screening. I. Prediction of the high-rish neonate.

Authors:  C J Hobel; M A Hyvarinen; D M Okada; W Oh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-09-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Perinatal outcome in the absence of antepartum fetal heart rate acceleration.

Authors:  K J Leveno; M L Williams; R T DePalma; P J Whalley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Problems of antepartal cardiotocography.

Authors:  E Halberstadt; R Schuhmann
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.901

4.  A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I. Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results.

Authors:  R K Freeman; G Anderson; W Dorchester
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Clinical application of a scoring system for evaluation of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring.

Authors:  H B Krebs; R E Petres
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The significance of single sporadic deceleration during a nonstress test.

Authors:  Z J Hagay; M Mazor; J R Leiberman; M Katz; V Insler
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Predictive value of a single unstressed antepartum cardiotocogram in apparently uncomplicated pregnancy. Introduction of a new cardiotocography score.

Authors:  C Lenstrup
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Electronic fetal monitoring and clinical practice. A survey of obstetric opinion.

Authors:  A B Cohen; H Klapholz; M S Thompson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Significance of unstressed antepartum cardiotocography performed weekly in last trimester of apparently normal pregnancy.

Authors:  C Lenstrup
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Significance of antepartum cardiotocography in normal pregnancy.

Authors:  J B Trimbos; M J Keirse
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1978-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.