Literature DB >> 21279063

The rural physician and myocardial infarction: part 2: the hospital phase of treatment.

D P Black.   

Abstract

A critical review of the literature reveals several facts which are important in helping the rural physician decide where and how patients with myocardial infarction should be treated. The effectiveness of coronary care units has not been well established, even for patients admitted during the early phase of the disease; they do not benefit the majority of patients admitted five or more hours after the onset of symptoms. Transporting patients over relatively long distances during the early phase results in increased mortality. The survival rates for patients treated in small hospitals is quite comparable to that of patients treated in coronary care units. The majority of rural patients with myocardial infarction are therefore more appropriately treated in a small local hospital than by being transferred to a coronary care unit. Those coronary care units which have been established in small hospitals do not appear to have reduced mortality. Patients with myocardial infarction who are being treated in small hospitals should be observed carefully, but electronic monitoring should be used only when there is a specific indication.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 21279063      PMCID: PMC2154103     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  21 in total

1.  Heart-rate changes during movement of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H C Mulholland; J F Pantridge
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-06-22       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Is coronary care really feasible in small rural hospitals?

Authors:  R N Headley; L F Woodruff; L H Nelson
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 0.954

3.  Natural history of acute coronary heart attacks. A community study.

Authors:  A Armstrong; B Duncan; M F Oliver; D G Julian; K W Donald; M Fulton; W Lutz; S L Morrison
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1972-01

4.  Benefits obtained by the introduction of a coronary-care unit. A comparative study.

Authors:  I Christiansen; K Iversen; A P Skouby
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1971-04

5.  Comparison of the effects of treatment of acute myocardial infarction in a coronary unit and on a general medical ward.

Authors:  R L MacMillan; K W Brown
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1971-11-20       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  The coronary care unit.

Authors:  B Lown; A Selzer
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Coronary care in a small rural hospital.

Authors:  A P Naney
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  A coronary care unit in a 25-bed rural hospital.

Authors:  J P Geyman
Journal:  Calif Med       Date:  1970-01

9.  Management of myocardial infarction in a rural area.

Authors:  D P Black
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1973-11-03       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Acute myocardial infarction: home and hospital treatment.

Authors:  H G Mather; N G Pearson; K L Read; D B Shaw; G R Steed; M G Thorne; S Jones; C J Guerrier; C D Eraut; P M McHugh; N R Chowdhury; M H Jafary; T J Wallace
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1971-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.